Great British Energy Bill Report Stage: Amendment 6
124Ayes
361Noes
Defeated · majority 237 · Government won164 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 124 · No 361 · DNV 164 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on Amendment 6 to the Great British Energy Bill during its Report Stage on 29 October 2024. The amendment, put forward by the Conservatives, sought to limit or modify the scope of Great British Energy, the proposed publicly owned clean energy company. The vote was defeated by 361 votes to 124, meaning the amendment did not pass and the Bill continued without the proposed changes. The Great British Energy Bill is the Government's flagship legislation to create a state-owned energy company intended to accelerate investment in renewable energy, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and support communities and local energy projects. Defeating this amendment means the Bill will proceed in its current form, without the restrictions the Conservatives sought to impose. The legislation affects energy policy across the whole of the United Kingdom, with implications for energy bills, the green energy transition, jobs, and community-level power generation. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 316 Labour MPs and all 36 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the amendment, alongside the three Green MPs. The 99 Conservative MPs present voted in favour, joined by all nine Scottish National Party members, all six Reform UK members, all five Democratic Unionist Party members, and one Ulster Unionist. Five independents voted on each side. There were no notable cross-party rebellions. The debate took place one day before the 2024 Autumn Budget, with the Conservatives using the occasion to criticise broader Labour economic decisions, while Labour MPs defended the Bill as essential to cleaning up what they described as the previous government's energy failures.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring GB Energy to publish clear, year-by-year cost estimates for the energy transition so that MPs and the public can scrutinise what decarbonisation will actually cost households
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, arguing it could be used to undermine the clean energy transition and that cost transparency requirements of this kind are not appropriate in the Bill
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
316
45
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
99
0
17
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
—
4
5
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
9
0
0
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposition shadow minister demanding amendments to hold government accountable for unfulfilled election promises on £300 bill cuts and 650,000 jobs; also tabled independent review requirement for GB Energy oversight.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,073 words) →
Defended government as cleaning up 14 years of Conservative energy mismanagement and reliance on volatile fossil fuels.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,269 words) →
Made maiden speech endorsing Great British Energy Bill as transformative for communities like Bolsover, delivering jobs, cheaper energy, and state investment in left-behind areas.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,477 words) →
Called for GB Energy to prioritise deep geothermal technology as strategic priority for heat decarbonisation and economic transition of oil/gas workforce.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (743 words) →
Championed Bill's potential for community energy investment and local wealth distribution; argued infrastructure success depends on local community buy-in and benefit-sharing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,079 words) →
Supported Bill in principle but pressed for amendments ensuring community energy and home insulation are explicit duties; expressed concern government words differ from legislative commitments.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,773 words) →
Made maiden speech supporting Bill as delivering energy security and jobs for manufacturing-based constituencies like Erewash, replacing fossil fuel reliance.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,893 words) →
Backed new clauses requiring nature recovery duty and prohibition on investments increasing greenhouse gas emissions to strengthen environmental outcomes.Green · Voted no · Read full speech (1,469 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0