Great British Energy Bill Report Stage: Amendment 6
124Ayes
361Noes
Defeated · majority 237 · Government won164 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 124 · No 361 · DNV 164 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 29 October 2024 to reject Amendment 6 to the Great British Energy Bill, which would have required the Bill to include binding commitments on reducing household energy bills by £300, creating jobs, and meeting other specific delivery benchmarks. The amendment was defeated by 361 votes to 124. The amendment sought to write the Labour Party's pre-election promises directly into legislation, making them enforceable targets rather than aspirational objectives. Had it passed, Great British Energy would have been legally bound to deliver quantifiable outcomes on consumer bills and employment. Its defeat means the organisation will pursue its statutory objects, covering clean energy production, improving energy efficiency, and ensuring energy security, without being tied to specific numerical commitments of that kind. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 316 Labour MPs and all 36 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment. The Conservatives provided the bulk of the 124 ayes, joined by the SNP, Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party, and the Ulster Unionist Party. The Greens voted no alongside the Government. Four independents voted aye and five voted no. There were no notable cross-party rebellions on the Government side.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring Great British Energy to meet specific, measurable targets on reducing consumer energy bills and creating jobs, holding the Government to its pre-election promises.
Voting No meant
Oppose writing specific delivery targets such as a £300 bill reduction into the legislation, preferring to let Great British Energy pursue its statutory objectives without being bound by particular numerical commitments.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
316
45
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
99
0
17
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
—
4
5
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
9
0
0
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports expanding Bill scope to retail, manufacturing, local government, elections and political parties; calls for digital sovereignty strategy to reduce reliance on US cloud providers and prioritise British tech procurement.Liberal Democrats · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (5,465 words) →
Backs selective expansion to large retail businesses (£12bn+ revenue threshold) and calls for review of foreign state-owned cellular IoT providers; concerned about public sector lock-in to AWS and Microsoft.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,828 words) →
Supports the Bill but champions Amendment 3 to prohibit data-sharing with countries lacking fair trial guarantees; warns against treating totalitarian states as normal commercial actors.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,958 words) →
Agrees with concerns on Jimmy Lai, Jagtar Singh Johal, and IoT kill switches in critical infrastructure; supports human rights safeguards in data-sharing.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,686 words) →
Questions practical feasibility of digital sovereignty strategy given prevalence of Taiwanese chips in tech supply chains.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (32 words) →
Urges integration of Belfast's cyber-security sector (2,750 employees, £258m GVA) into national cyber strategy and calls for use of British tech firms by government.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0