A divisionDivision No. 21 · Wednesday, 16 October 2024· Commons· GP Services

Opposition day: Access to primary healthcare

80Ayes
337Noes
Defeated · majority 257 · Government won
230 did not vote
Aye82No337DID NOT VOTE · 230

647 Members · Aye 80 · No 337 · DNV 230 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 16 October 2024, the House of Commons voted on a Conservative opposition day motion calling for improved access to GP services and primary healthcare, and criticising the Labour government's approach to health policy. The motion was defeated by 337 votes to 80, a majority of 257 against. The motion, had it passed, would have placed Parliament on record demanding better access to GP appointments and criticising the government's management of primary care. While opposition day motions (debates initiated by the party not in government) do not themselves change law, they serve as a formal statement of parliamentary opinion and can pressure the government to alter its approach. GP access has been a persistent public concern, with long waiting times for appointments affecting millions of people across England. Labour and its Co-operative Party allies voted unanimously against the motion, providing the bulk of the 337 no votes. The Conservatives, who tabled the motion, are not recorded in the voting figures, suggesting most abstained or were absent rather than voting aye. The Liberal Democrats were the largest group voting in favour, with 67 of their MPs supporting the motion, making them the leading opposition force in this division. Smaller parties including Plaid Cymru, the Greens, Reform UK, and some independents also voted aye. The vote reflects the Liberal Democrats' prominent campaign positioning on NHS and GP access issues, a theme they pressed heavily during the 2024 general election.

Voting Aye meant
Support the opposition's motion calling for improved access to GP and primary healthcare services
Voting No meant
Reject the opposition's motion on GP access, likely arguing the government already has plans to address primary healthcare capacity
§ 01Who voted how.417 voting Members · 230 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
297
64
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
67
0
5
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
4
2
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Helen MorganOpposedNorth Shropshire
Primary care is in crisis and requires urgent investment in GPs, dentists and pharmacists, with guaranteed access within 7 days for routine care and 24 hours for urgent needs; criticized Conservative underfunding and broken promises on GP numbers.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,012 words)
Karin SmythSupportiveBristol South
Primary care is broken but not beaten; Government is taking immediate action with Darzi review, £82 million for 1,000 new GPs, red tape challenge, and planning for long-term neighbourhood health service.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,506 words)
Dr Caroline JohnsonNeutralSleaford and North Hykeham
The NHS faces legitimate structural challenges including aging population and pandemic legacy; Conservatives delivered record funding and new medical schools; Labour's early record shows limited concrete achievement beyond statements.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,337 words)
Laura Kyrke-SmithSupportiveAylesbury
The broken system was inherited from Conservatives; early steps like red tape challenge and GP recruitment funding show intent; expansion of community care, technology, and prevention focus are necessary long-term solutions.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (907 words)
Layla MoranOpposedOxford West and Abingdon
GP crisis requires urgent increase in fully qualified GPs, improved digital systems, prevention focus, and continuity of care; Health and Social Care Committee recommendations should guide 10-year plan.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,005 words)
Dr Ellie ChownsQuestioningNorth Herefordshire
NHS underfunding compared to peers requires billions in investment; need protection mechanism to ensure primary care funding is safeguarded and ratcheted up over time, not constantly raided to cover hospital overspends.Green · Voted aye · Read full speech (448 words)
Deirdre CostiganSupportiveEaling Southall
Fourteen years of Conservative decline has caused severe health inequalities and emergency admissions; new Labour Government has already begun turning the page through investment in primary care and reformed approach.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (641 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0