A divisionDivision No. 48 · Tuesday, 26 November 2024· Commons· Health

Tobacco and Vapes Bill: Second Reading

415Ayes
47Noes
Carried · majority 368 · Government won
185 did not vote
Aye416No48DID NOT VOTE · 185

647 Members · Aye 415 · No 47 · DNV 185 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 26 November 2024 to give the Tobacco and Vapes Bill its second reading, passing it by 415 votes to 47. A second reading is the first full parliamentary vote on a bill, approving its general principles and allowing it to proceed to detailed scrutiny. The bill would create a generational ban on tobacco sales by making it illegal to sell cigarettes and other tobacco products to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009, meaning the minimum purchase age rises by one year every year until smoking is, in theory, eliminated as a commercial activity. The practical effect, if the bill completes its passage, is that young people entering adulthood today will never legally be able to buy tobacco. It also tightens rules on vaping and nicotine products, bans vending machines for those products, restricts advertising, and introduces a retail licensing scheme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Smokers already over the age threshold are unaffected, but every subsequent cohort of new adults would be permanently excluded from purchasing tobacco. The bill also gives ministers powers to extend smoke-free rules to some outdoor settings, though the government confirmed during the debate that it does not intend to include outdoor pub spaces. The vote cut across normal party lines. All 289 Labour and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted in favour, as did the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens. Thirty-two Conservative MPs voted against, while 23 voted with the government; 61 Conservatives had no vote recorded. Seven Liberal Democrats voted no, against 37 who supported the bill. All six Reform UK MPs who voted did so against. The bill had originally been introduced under the previous Conservative government by then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, giving it an unusual cross-party origin that featured prominently in the debate.

Voting Aye meant
Support introducing a generational ban on tobacco sales, tighter restrictions on vaping products, and a retail licensing scheme as a major public health intervention to eventually end smoking in the UK.
Voting No meant
Oppose the bill, either on grounds of personal freedom and the right of adults to choose to smoke, concerns about the practicality of enforcement, or scepticism about the scope of government regulation of lifestyle choices.
§ 01Who voted how.462 voting Members · 185 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
289
0
72
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
23
32
61
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
37
7
27
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
33
0
9
Independent
10
2
2
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
The Bill delivers targeted relief to households and businesses hit by Middle East conflict-driven energy and fuel costs; the levy rise is justified as capturing exceptional generator revenues without harming investment, and the measures represent good long-term economic management.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,644 words)
James WildQuestioningNorth West Norfolk
The measures are welcome but lack clarity and coherence—the levy is raised without a published end date or pre-tested policy on decoupling electricity and gas prices, and the HGV relief is temporary with no long-term strategy; Parliament needs formal reviews to assess whether these short-term fixes actually work.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,833 words)
Daisy CooperNeutralSt Albans
The Government's measures are well-intentioned and the Lib Dems support them, but transparency matters for public trust; require reports on how levy revenue is spent, simplify the claims process for care workers, and assess the real impact of HGV relief on supply chains.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,017 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0