GP Services.
General practice and primary care
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | -50 | 0% on-whip · 297 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 67 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | -50 | 0% on-whip · 36 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +17 | 67% on-whip · 6 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2024 | Opposition day: Access to primary healthcare Aye: Support the opposition's motion calling for improved access to GP and primary healthcare services · No: Reject the opposition's motion on GP access, likely arguing the government already has plans to address primary healthcare capacity | 82 | 337 | No |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “GP Services” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.