The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 825 contributions

Speeches by Yang.

Every Hansard contribution by Yuan Yang this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 825 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Yes.

1
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

You had many conversations with three or four internal economists as well as all the external economists you mentioned. Having spent a lot of time among academic economists, I know they are prone to disagree about many things. Ultimately, and institutionally, is it down to you to make that decision? Is it you and you a

66
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

I appreciate that there is something to be said for letting the dust settle. How is this decision made institutionally? For example, I think you have around a dozen economists working in the OBR. Was there a discussion with them? Was there a discussion between the three members of the committee?

51
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

I will turn now to Professor Miles on the macro picture on productivity. We have spoken to you before, when you have made previous appearances before this Committee, about your optimism on growth relative to other forecasters. Of course, the IMF, the Bank of England and others downgraded the UK’s productivity in previo

110
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

To go back to your earlier point about trying to address the misconceptions out there that forecasts vary wildly between rounds, is it correct to say that between different rounds, week to week, there might not be that huge variance, but between six-month forecasts there is certainly a large variance, in terms of the c

59
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Right. So between one six-month forecast to the next, the “average absolute revision”, pre-measures, is £21 billion. That is quite a large part of historical and current—

27
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Can I also clarify a figure from the EFO itself? You write about a “£21 billion average absolute revision” to borrowing “in the…pre-measures forecast”. Is that £21 billion the difference between different six-month forecasts? Am I reading that correctly?

39
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Do you have a sense of whether that amount is large or small compared with previous fluctuations between round 1 and round 3?

23
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

So in this case the £6.7 billion fluctuation from round 1 to round 3 is actually smaller than it might have been in the past, when your forecasts were more unstable. I am curious to know, and would be very grateful if you could set out, perhaps in a letter, the volatility from previous rounds that we have not been able

77
2 Dec 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Thank you both for appearing before us this morning. Mr Josephs, I wanted to go back to the point that you both touched on very briefly about the fluctuations between rounds of forecasts. From my reading, the change between round 1 and round 3—so, across all the pre-measures rounds—is about £6.7 billion. Am I right in

67
27 Nov 2025Budget Resolutions

I rise to welcome the Budget, because despite the difficult economic times we are in, the Chancellor has made decisions that are strong, sound and fair. It is a strong budget that more than doubles the fiscal headroom to £22 billion. It is a sound budget that improves the economic efficiency of some of our taxes and ma

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobscost-of-living
1,062
27 Nov 2025Budget Resolutions

Three quarters of the tax raised by this Budget will go towards building fiscal headroom, doubling it—something that previous Conservative Chancellors never did. Does the hon. Lady welcome the investment in the gilt markets that international investors have now shown, demonstrating their confidence in the UK economy?

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobscost-of-living
47
26 Nov 2025 Budget Resolutions

rose—

economy-jobscost-of-livingsocial-care
1
26 Nov 2025 Budget Resolutions

Given the hon. Gentleman’s interest in the bond yields, will he celebrate with me and other Labour Members today’s rally in yields, as well as the increase in the value of sterling and in the FTSE?

economy-jobscost-of-livingsocial-care
36
26 Nov 2025 Budget Resolutions

I, too, very much enjoy reading the Blue Book. While we are talking about our favourite passages, I wonder what the right hon. Gentleman makes of page 29, which says that “persistent weakness in productivity growth relative to the pre-financial crisis period is more likely to reflect underlying structural trends.” What

economy-jobscost-of-livingsocial-care
69
26 Nov 2025 Budget Resolutions

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for giving way. Does he find it fiscally responsible that with his two Budgets, he left us with the lowest amount of fiscal headroom since the OBR was created at £8.9 billion in 2024? Is he proud of that? That left the current Chancellor and this Labour Government a mountain to climb to

economy-jobscost-of-livingsocial-care
68
17 Nov 2025Settlement: British National Overseas Route

Reading is proud to be a town of many immigrant diasporas, including Hong Kong BNOs who are seeking refuge here. Many of my immigrant constituents have lived in our community for years, and they work incredibly hard so that they can put down roots, much as my parents did when I was a child. Will the Minister acknowledg

immigrationlabour-market
74
17 Nov 2025Settlement: British National Overseas Route

14. Whether she has made a recent assessment of the potential impact of exempting British national overseas visa holders from the proposed extension of the settlement qualifying period on levels of net migration.

immigrationlabour-market
33
12 Nov 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

I appreciate Mr Donnell and Ms Allsopp’s points about young families being prevented from moving into houses of the appropriate size, because I see that happening in my constituency in Reading. Professor Leunig, you have made a proposal for an annual national property tax. That would mean that rather than the Governmen

96
12 Nov 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Thank you, Professor Leunig. Mr Donnell, you are smiling. Could you comment on the impact of Professor Leunig’s proposal? What impact do you think such a proposal would have on the market?

32
← PreviousPage 13 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.