Speeches by Russell.
Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Russell this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 21–40 of 347 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 19 May 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 194) “What is your KPI for how quickly the email goes after the breach?” | 13 |
| 19 May 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 194) “Do you have a KPI for how quickly that email gets sent after the breach?” | 15 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response Update “Could my right hon. Friend the Minister please confirm whether any documents that were previously in the scope of the Humble Address have been deemed no longer to be within its scope due to the application of litigation privilege in respect of the dismissal of Olly Robbins?” mp-performancefiscal-policyother | 47 |
| 21 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623) “It is on page 32. “HMIP’s Children in Custody 2023-24 report found that only 12% of unsentenced children took part in any interventions, such as offending behaviour programmes and in some establishments, interventions were limited to sentenced children in some establishments. This means that no meaningful work would ha…” | 62 |
| 21 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623) “It makes sense because they have not been found guilty.” | 10 |
| 21 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623) “Also emotional control, for instance: you do not have to admit an offence to accept that you might have a problem with emotional control.” | 24 |
| 20 Apr 2026 | Security Vetting “It is accepted by many on the Government Benches that the Prime Minister did not know the outcome of the vetting, but the Cabinet Secretary came forward on Tuesday, having spent a month researching whether or not she could provide the advice that she did, so she had clearly thought very carefully about the information …” mp-performancedefence | 105 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “That is great, but fundamentally my question is about when someone instructs a solicitor, and they think it is going to cost £1,000 but then it actually costs £5,000 and that expectation has not been managed from start to finish in the transaction. They may get a retrospective explanation for why that cost escalated, b…” | 85 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “The reality is that if you have an ongoing legal matter and you need ongoing support, you do not want to upset your lawyer by putting in a formal complaint about them, let alone complain to the SRA in any way, shape or form. My gut feeling is that if you did some survey work of the type that you have described of peopl…” | 72 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “One of the elements of the report refers to the fact that judicial appointments were not apparently liaising in any way with the Bar Standards Board. Do you feel that indicates a failure on your part?” | 36 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “It might be. It depends if the AI is hallucinating. It depends if the AI is trustworthy.” | 17 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “What are you doing about costs? To put that comment into some context, I am a solicitor, but my experience of friends and family using law firms is that they have not received transparent information up front about costs and that they have been consistently surprised by the bills that they received. As a solicitor, I f…” | 115 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “The report was issued in September last year. What concrete steps have you taken in your organisation to change it to reflect the report?” | 24 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “The Bar Standards Board made decisions, such as those listed in the report, around male barristers who inappropriately touched and consistently harassed very junior female barristers—sometimes pupils—in ways that constituted public sexual assault. Those men were suspended for three months—the examples are all in the re…” | 64 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “What work, if any, are you doing on AI bias? How that will be managed within the sector?” | 18 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “Have you read Baroness Harman’s report, “Independent review of bullying and harassment at the Bar”?” | 15 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “You were established in 2007, so the SRA is a relatively recent organisation, but not that new. I got the impression from what you just said that it was probably quite innovative work for you to speak to people who had experience of using legal services. Is that a fair characterisation?” | 51 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “Perhaps, but as a regulator, that is quite a big assumption.” | 11 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “Do you think that that discloses any areas in which you should function differently?” | 14 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “Making bad decisions faster is not an improvement for the women who are on the receiving end of this harassment—I mean, it is a slight improvement, but it is not the wholesale change that will sort out the culture at the Bar. I understand that you cannot intervene in individual decisions—I would not expect you to—but i…” | 76 |