Whether (a) Ministers and (b) civil servants have received representations in writing from Charlesbye Limited.
Awaiting answer.
Every parliamentary written question tabled by Mike Wood this session, with the full answer and department. See how every department answers, or back to the MP page.
Showing 21–40 of 1,929 · Cabinet Office
Whether (a) Ministers and (b) civil servants have received representations in writing from Charlesbye Limited.
Awaiting answer.
Pursuant to the answer of 29 May 2026, to Question 2081, on Prime Minister: Public Expenditure, how much was spent on each of the individual suppliers listed and which items were purchased.
Awaiting answer.
Pursuant to the answer of 23 June 2026, to Question 8158, on Lord Mandelson and Morgan McSweeney, on what date Morgan McSweeney provided his electronic messages to the Cabinet Office.
Awaiting answer.
Pursuant to the answer of 23 June 2026, to Question 9084, on Lord Mandelson, what information his Department holds on whether the Intelligence and Security Committee had access to independent legal advice other than Cabinet Office or Government Legal Service lawyers for the consideration of the redactions on the Humble Address.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to the answer of 20 March 2026, to Question 119894, on Gambling Commission: Managers, if he will make it his policy to ask the Civil Service Commission to review the business appointment provisions of (a) the Gambling Commission and (b) other public sector regulators.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to the answer of 2 March 2026, to Question 108235, on Senior Civil Servants: Recruitment, how many of the 90 SCS roles which were not recruited externally, broken down by pay band, were in his Department.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to his statement on Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion of 11 March 2026, Official Report, Column 360, which document had a limited redaction.
Awaiting answer.
Whether there is a policy on the maximum number of special advisers who may be in post at any time across government.
Awaiting answer.
Further to the guidance, PPN 024 - The Public Interest Test and Insourcing Strategy, published on 17 June 2026, what are the type of public interest considerations that would be deemed appropriate to justify insourcing.
Awaiting answer.
Whether the Cabinet Office has issued guidance to (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) civil servants on the change in Labour Party leadership.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to the written statement of 17 June 2026, HCWS120, on Update of Insourcing, what the cost is of the contracts relating to the 83 government buildings that expire in 2028.
Awaiting answer.
Whether Oliver Robbins was given (a) a formal or (b) an informal steer from Downing Street (i) civil servants or (ii) special advisers to take steps to facilitate Lord Mandelson’s appointment as Ambassador.
Awaiting answer.
Whether his Department has had discussions with Global Counsel on responding to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson.
Awaiting answer.
Pursuant to the answer of 15 June 2026 to Question 4233 on Government Communication Service, what the equivalent budget and headcount was for predecessor bodies to the Government Media Unit in 2025-26.
Awaiting answer.
Whether guidance was issued to the Civil Service in Scotland on pre-election purdah for UK Parliamentary by-elections.
Awaiting answer.
Whether the Government Communications Service is being reduced in size as part of departmental efficiency targets.
Awaiting answer.
What guidance his Department has issued to departments on the disclosure of the names of organisations who are respondents to public consultations and calls for evidence.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to the written statement of 17 June 2026, HCWS120, on Update of Insourcing, what the baseline level of outsourcing across departments is; and what estimate he has made of changes to administrative and running costs from increased insourcing.
Awaiting answer.
Whether the vetting and due diligence exercise for the appointment of Lord Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States considered (a) the Financial Times report entitled Links between Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein detailed in JPMorgan report, published on 21 June 2023 and (b) the associated material on the Epstein-Mandelson relationship detailed in JP Morgan's Project Jeep released by the US courts, reference: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (1:22-cv-10904), District Court, S.D. New York, published on 20 June 2023, Exhibit 4.
Awaiting answer.
Following errors identified in the Labour Force Survey, whether the (a) Cabinet Office and (b) UK Statistics Authority made an assessment of the accuracy of Office for National Statistics statistics.
Awaiting answer.