Pursuant to the answer of 5 June 2026 to Question 5780 on Lord Mandelson, whether the Gordon Brown correspondence on Lord Mandelson was passed to the Metropolitan Police.
Awaiting answer.
Every parliamentary written question tabled by Mike Wood this session, with the full answer and department. See how every department answers, or back to the MP page.
Showing 1–20 of 1,929 · Cabinet Office
Pursuant to the answer of 5 June 2026 to Question 5780 on Lord Mandelson, whether the Gordon Brown correspondence on Lord Mandelson was passed to the Metropolitan Police.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volumes 1 and 2 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, whether Lord Mandelson used a non-government email address for government business while he was Ambassador to the United States.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to the Integrated Security Fund annual report 2024 to 2025, published on 30 October 2025, and the Supreme Court ruling in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025], why the Integrated Security Fund refers to gender and not sex; and whether he plans to update the Integrated Security Fund language to sex.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volumes 1 and 2 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, whether papers relating to Global Counsel were in scope of the response to the Humble Address of 4 February 2026.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volumes 1 and 2 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, what role the Cabinet Secretary played in the appointment of Lord Mandelson as Ambassador to the United States.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volumes 1 and 2 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, whether people mentioned in the Government return to the Humble Address were consulted on any (a) exclusions and (b) redactions in the material that was released prior to publication; and whether there was a Maxwellisation process.
Awaiting answer.
Whether the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson included information that had been held by civil servants who had left Crown Service.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volumes 1 and 2 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, what the terms of reference were of the fact-finding exercise of the General Counsel to the Prime Minister in the context of the return to the Humble Address; and whether there was a report of that exercise.
Awaiting answer.
If he will instruct the Cabinet Office Procurement Review Unit to review the decision of the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime not to approve the Metropolitan Police's contract with Palantir.
Awaiting answer.
What the specific event was for each of the individual room hires since 4 April 2025 other than Civil Service Live and the Infected Blood Inquiry.
Awaiting answer.
Who first suggested to the Prime Minister that Peter Mandelson should be appointed as Ambassador to the United States.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volumes 1 and 2 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, if he will publish the completed UKSV tick box vetting form relating to Lord Mandelson.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volumes 1 and 2 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, whether electronic communications between Lord Mandelson and Morgan McSweeney have been copied to the official record and retained.
Awaiting answer.
Whether the documents relating to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson that have been withheld at the request of the Metropolitan Police include communications between Lord Mandelson and the Prime Minister.
Awaiting answer.
With reference to Volume 1 of the Government response to the Humble Address on Lord Mandelson, who was interviewed by the General Counsel to the Prime Minister in his fact-finding exercise in the context of the return to the Humble Address; and how many people were interviewed.
Awaiting answer.
Whether he plans to publish Lord Mandelson's completed conflicts of interest form and declarations in a future volume of the Humble Address return.
Awaiting answer.
Pursuant to the answer of 23 June 2026, to Question 8158, on Lord Mandelson and Morgan McSweeney, on what date Morgan McSweeney provided his electronic messages to the Cabinet Office.
Awaiting answer.
Whether (a) Cabinet Office Legal Advisers and (b) the National Security Adviser had a role in redaction of the material to be released in response to the Humble Address of 4 February 2026.
Awaiting answer.
What role did the UK National Security Advisor have in the (a) consideration, (b) selection and (c) appointment of Peter Mandelson as UK Ambassador to the United States.
Awaiting answer.
Whether (a) Ministers and (b) civil servants have received representations in writing from Charlesbye Limited.
Awaiting answer.