Speeches by Wrigley.
Every Hansard contribution by Martin Wrigley this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 61–80 of 372 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “I do not think so. I think you are looking at many of the right things. There was not anything that struck me other than the features that I have talked about to help us reduce duplication for the Ministers.” | 40 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “I am not sure I see the purpose of named day questions, which we do not use very often. Questions are answered in reasonable timeframes, so I do not see the need for them. I can see that they might be particularly necessary if we have got something absolutely urgent, but normally with a written question you have enough…” | 109 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “I do not. I find AI is exceptionally good at summarising documents, giving me a three-minute version of a five-minute speech. That is absolutely fantastic. But creating new things? It is not creative. AI does not actually create anything new; it can only replicate what other people have written before. Arguably, you co…” | 75 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “It is very straightforward. There is a bug in the oral questions system. When you click to submit a topical question, you then have to click that it is topical again within the body. But you do not have that bug in the written question system. I am a computer architect of 40 years, so I deal with systems easily.” | 60 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “We use them extensively. You might have seen that I am quite high on the list—I think I am No. 3 on the list of people who use them extensively. What I really like about them is that when you have, say, an oral question in the house and you get the usual “Yes, no, maybe, but if, unless it’s Friday”-type answer—a non-re…” | 325 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “I do not. I find AI is exceptionally good at summarising documents, giving me a three-minute version of a five-minute speech. That is absolutely fantastic. But creating new things? It is not creative. AI does not actually create anything new; it can only replicate what other people have written before. Arguably, you co…” | 75 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “Thank you, Chair. I am Martin Wrigley, MP for Newton Abbot. I was elected in July 2024. It is an honour to be part of this process.” | 27 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “I am not sure I see the purpose of named day questions, which we do not use very often. Questions are answered in reasonable timeframes, so I do not see the need for them. I can see that they might be particularly necessary if we have got something absolutely urgent, but normally with a written question you have enough…” | 109 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “May I add one thing? Having submitted well over 1,000 questions over the past year, I would like to thank the Table Office for going through all the questions and for all the work that they do behind the scenes. Without them, it would be very hard work. I would like to put on the record my thanks to all the staff who d…” | 65 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “I do not think so. I think you are looking at many of the right things. There was not anything that struck me other than the features that I have talked about to help us reduce duplication for the Ministers.” | 40 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “I do not. I find AI is exceptionally good at summarising documents, giving me a three-minute version of a five-minute speech. That is absolutely fantastic. But creating new things? It is not creative. AI does not actually create anything new; it can only replicate what other people have written before. Arguably, you co…” | 75 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “It is very straightforward. There is a bug in the oral questions system. When you click to submit a topical question, you then have to click that it is topical again within the body. But you do not have that bug in the written question system. I am a computer architect of 40 years, so I deal with systems easily.” | 60 |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49) “We use them extensively. You might have seen that I am quite high on the list—I think I am No. 3 on the list of people who use them extensively. What I really like about them is that when you have, say, an oral question in the house and you get the usual “Yes, no, maybe, but if, unless it’s Friday”-type answer—a non-re…” | 325 |
| 1 Jun 2026 | Health Bill “I will focus on two things: the changes in data privacy and access to support a centralised single patient record, and the abolition of Healthwatch. Healthwatch is not the same as the other regulators and it should not be amalgamated. Regulators can be amalgamated only if they have a single purpose and a single viewpoi…” healthtechnologylocal-government | 119 |
| 1 Jun 2026 | Health Bill “I absolutely agree with the hon. Member. We heard earlier how Kevin Dixon of Devon gives us excellent reports of what is happening with Healthwatch. The modern NHS must run on data, but critically, on data that carries the consent of patients. A single patient record is undeniably critical to see the data of patients a…” healthtechnologylocal-government | 378 |
| 1 Jun 2026 | Health Bill “All the features that the hon. Member is asking for are available to people within the Greater Manchester area. Exactly those things are there and work today, even down to the remote monitoring he mentions.” healthtechnologylocal-government | 35 |
| 20 May 2026 | Defence Readiness “We have had a very interesting debate, with interesting speeches from many Members. I, too, am fully behind the rapid increase in funds for defence and I wish to add my thanks to our serving personnel. Defence readiness requires a whole-society response and sovereign capability. Across a wide range of issues in our tec…” defencefiscal-policy | 722 |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Park Home Owners “I thank the hon. Member for securing this valuable debate. I have a good number of park home sites in my constituency. Not only do they suffer the 10% commission, poor maintenance levels and high service charges, but they have atrocious service on the utilities that they have to buy through the park home owner. Some ye…” housinglocal-governmentcost-of-living | 141 |
| 21 Apr 2026 | Peter Mandelson: Government Appointment “Yesterday, I asked the Prime Minister about the security vetting condition that required Peter Mandelson to be accompanied when visiting previous clients. Does my right hon. Friend agree that we need to find out whether the lack of accompaniment when visiting Palantir in Washington with the Prime Minister was a one-off…” mp-performancedefenceeconomy-jobs | 58 |
| 16 Apr 2026 | NHS Federated Data Platform “If the right hon. Gentleman looks at the contract, he will see that it is subscription only: deliveries under supplier software—none; deliveries under third-party software—none. Any programming written under the contract is owned by Palantir. The contract has to be adapted for any next phase so that Palantir can be mov…” healthtechnologyeconomy-jobs | 841 |