The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 372 contributions

Speeches by Wrigley.

Every Hansard contribution by Martin Wrigley this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 4160 of 372 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 3 of 19Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

May I add one thing? Having submitted well over 1,000 questions over the past year, I would like to thank the Table Office for going through all the questions and for all the work that they do behind the scenes. Without them, it would be very hard work. I would like to put on the record my thanks to all the staff who d

65
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am not sure I see the purpose of named day questions, which we do not use very often. Questions are answered in reasonable timeframes, so I do not see the need for them. I can see that they might be particularly necessary if we have got something absolutely urgent, but normally with a written question you have enough

109
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I do not think so. I think you are looking at many of the right things. There was not anything that struck me other than the features that I have talked about to help us reduce duplication for the Ministers.

40
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I do not think so. I think you are looking at many of the right things. There was not anything that struck me other than the features that I have talked about to help us reduce duplication for the Ministers.

40
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

It is very straightforward. There is a bug in the oral questions system. When you click to submit a topical question, you then have to click that it is topical again within the body. But you do not have that bug in the written question system. I am a computer architect of 40 years, so I deal with systems easily.

60
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I do not. I find AI is exceptionally good at summarising documents, giving me a three-minute version of a five-minute speech. That is absolutely fantastic. But creating new things? It is not creative. AI does not actually create anything new; it can only replicate what other people have written before. Arguably, you co

75
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am not sure I see the purpose of named day questions, which we do not use very often. Questions are answered in reasonable timeframes, so I do not see the need for them. I can see that they might be particularly necessary if we have got something absolutely urgent, but normally with a written question you have enough

109
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I do not. I find AI is exceptionally good at summarising documents, giving me a three-minute version of a five-minute speech. That is absolutely fantastic. But creating new things? It is not creative. AI does not actually create anything new; it can only replicate what other people have written before. Arguably, you co

75
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

We use them extensively. You might have seen that I am quite high on the list—I think I am No. 3 on the list of people who use them extensively. What I really like about them is that when you have, say, an oral question in the house and you get the usual “Yes, no, maybe, but if, unless it’s Friday”-type answer—a non-re

325
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

It is very straightforward. There is a bug in the oral questions system. When you click to submit a topical question, you then have to click that it is topical again within the body. But you do not have that bug in the written question system. I am a computer architect of 40 years, so I deal with systems easily.

60
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

We use them extensively. You might have seen that I am quite high on the list—I think I am No. 3 on the list of people who use them extensively. What I really like about them is that when you have, say, an oral question in the house and you get the usual “Yes, no, maybe, but if, unless it’s Friday”-type answer—a non-re

325
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

May I add one thing? Having submitted well over 1,000 questions over the past year, I would like to thank the Table Office for going through all the questions and for all the work that they do behind the scenes. Without them, it would be very hard work. I would like to put on the record my thanks to all the staff who d

65
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Thank you, Chair. I am Martin Wrigley, MP for Newton Abbot. I was elected in July 2024. It is an honour to be part of this process.

27
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Thank you, Chair. I am Martin Wrigley, MP for Newton Abbot. I was elected in July 2024. It is an honour to be part of this process.

27
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

May I add one thing? Having submitted well over 1,000 questions over the past year, I would like to thank the Table Office for going through all the questions and for all the work that they do behind the scenes. Without them, it would be very hard work. I would like to put on the record my thanks to all the staff who d

65
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I do not think so. I think you are looking at many of the right things. There was not anything that struck me other than the features that I have talked about to help us reduce duplication for the Ministers.

40
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

May I add one thing? Having submitted well over 1,000 questions over the past year, I would like to thank the Table Office for going through all the questions and for all the work that they do behind the scenes. Without them, it would be very hard work. I would like to put on the record my thanks to all the staff who d

65
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am not sure I see the purpose of named day questions, which we do not use very often. Questions are answered in reasonable timeframes, so I do not see the need for them. I can see that they might be particularly necessary if we have got something absolutely urgent, but normally with a written question you have enough

109
3 Jun 2026Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address

I was trying not to interrupt his flow—[Interruption.] Until I did. Throughout the files there are mentions of Palantir and Peter Mandelson, including a memo in which he tries to introduce Peter Thiel to No. 10 staff in June last year. Even though Mr Louis Mosley has written to me today suggesting that Peter Mandelson

mp-performancedefencetechnology
74
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

It is very straightforward. There is a bug in the oral questions system. When you click to submit a topical question, you then have to click that it is topical again within the body. But you do not have that bug in the written question system. I am a computer architect of 40 years, so I deal with systems easily.

60
← PreviousPage 3 of 19 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.