The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 579 contributions

Speeches by Francois.

Every Hansard contribution by Mark Francois this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 6180 of 579 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 4 of 29Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Ministers keep talking about this “largest sustained increase” in defence spending since the cold war. Why, then, were there £2.6 billion of efficiency cuts last year, and why is there a target for £3.5 billion efficiency cuts this year?

defencetechnologylabour-market
39
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

As a right hon. Member, I am afraid that we have just heard the same ministerial bluster that we have had for months, so I will press the new clause to a vote. Question put, That the clause be read a Second time.

defencetechnologylabour-market
43
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Further to that point of order, Mr Efford. I very much echo the Minister’s sentiments. We have agreed with the general thrust of the Bill from day one. We said that we would attempt to be a critical friend and to improve it, or to make suggestions, and the Minister—to be fair to him—has said on a number of occasions th

defencetechnologylabour-market
182
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. Like our previous debate, I fear this may be an area on which, as a Committee, we find it difficult to agree overall. Nevertheless, this is a very important subject, and I am glad that we have an opportunity to debate it in Committee this afternoon—I am sad that, ag

defencetechnologylabour-market
982
15 Apr 2026Strategic Defence Review: Funding

Labour’s strategic defence review had three co-authors. I would like to ask the Minister a question about each of them in turn. Does he agree with Dr Fiona Hill that there is a “bizarre” lack of urgency in Government defence planning? Does he agree with General Sir Richard Barrons, co-author of the SDR, that there is “

defencefiscal-policyeconomy-jobs
327
15 Apr 2026Strategic Defence Review: Funding

(Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on his plans to fund the recommendations of the strategic defence review.

defencefiscal-policyeconomy-jobs
28
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

For the record, whatever we did or did not do in Government, we did not bring in the £2.6 billion of operational spending cuts in the financial year just gone. That is why our availability is so poor, and that was a purely Labour decision, was it not?

defence
48
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

Yes, Mr Efford. I will conclude there. I just wanted to know why the RFA is doing a job that the Royal Navy is supposed to do. After our debate yesterday, perhaps the Minister will enlighten the Committee.

defence
38
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

Thank you, Mr Efford. I just wanted to know who got the job. Turning to the RFA, I pay tribute to the hon. Member for Truro and Falmouth for what she has done to raise the profile of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. The issue is clearly extremely close to her heart. I believe that she was trying to advance a private Member’s

defence
365
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

As the title of clause 30 is “Commissioner’s functions in relation to Royal Fleet Auxiliary”, I will ask the Minister something about the commissioner and then something about the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. It would appear that, after some time, the Government have now announced someone to fill the position of commissioner

defence
120
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I do not think we need to have a debate on clause 20 stand part because we had a pretty thorough debate on the amendment, which covered most of the issues. I will seek the leave of the Committee to withdraw the amendment, but I would like to put down the marker that we have had an interesting debate and we might wish t

defence
115
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

This is not a criticism of the Minister, because no doubt he had other important things to do, but he was not on that visit, as I recall. As Her late Majesty once said, recollections may vary, but this was a point raised with us by the people presenting to us on the operation of the system. We did not invent it. They m

defence
136
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

In my experience, retired officers, particularly retired senior officers, are keenly aware of their pension entitlements. If we are paying them a pension through the armed forces pension scheme, we presumably know who they are and where they live. Via that database, it would not be particularly onerous to come up with

defence
93
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I again place on record our thanks to you, Mr Efford, and to our excellent Clerks and the team who organised a very good visit down to Portsmouth, where I think we learned a lot about the operation of the service courts in practice—I certainly did. A number of issues were raised in that discussion, not least about the

defence
882
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 9, in clause 20, page 34, line 27, at end insert “or (iii) a retired holder of such a rank.” This amendment would add retired officers to those qualified for membership of the Court Martial.

defence
40
26 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (Third sitting)

I will finish this point, then of course I will give way. Some housing associations have been looking after public sector housing, which is effectively what forces housing is, for decades. In my experience as a constituency MP, such housing associations vary in quality. There are some poor ones and some very good ones.

housingdefence
284
26 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (Third sitting)

Yes, and in the immortal words of Mandy Rice-Davies, they would say that, wouldn’t they? We were proposing a slightly more market-oriented solution. Registered social landlords are somewhere between the public and private sector. They are not entirely private entities or entities of the state, but are, practically, som

housingdefence
615
26 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (Third sitting)

For the record, that was the one recommendation in the “Stick or Twist?” report that was not adopted. All the other recommendations were adopted, including spending a lot of money on wraparound childcare because, again, childcare was a very important point for retention. Ben Wallace told me that he used the report to g

housingdefence
94
26 Mar 2026 Gurkha Veterans

As former Officer Cadet Francois 24663730, and latterly Lieutenant Francois, 5th Battalion, the Royal Anglian Regiment (Volunteers), I am proud to be asked to sum up for His Majesty’s official Opposition in this important debate about Gurkhas and their welfare. I congratulate the hon. and gallant Member for Tewkesbury

defencesocial-carecost-of-living
1,282
26 Mar 2026 Gurkha Veterans

—although I hear calls from senior Members behind me to do so. Nevertheless, I can perhaps provide at least some additional context to this debate. Let me set out what I mean by that. For many years, all western armies—be they American, Canadian, Australian, German or otherwise—have struggled to recruit and retain suff

defencesocial-carecost-of-living
618
← PreviousPage 4 of 29 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.