The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 579 contributions

Speeches by Francois.

Every Hansard contribution by Mark Francois this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 579 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 29Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I hope that we are all much refreshed. I should say up front that, while we have been able to conduct this Committee for most of the time in a relatively consensual manner, I fear that on this subject there may be some fundamental differences of principle at stake and that therefore we may find it genuinely difficult t

defencetechnologylabour-market
1,189
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

defencetechnologylabour-market
12
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am sure that the Chair can speak for himself, and I shall not try his patience. To end, in the next fortnight, Members will have to vote on whether to carry over the troubles Bill into the new Session or to let it die. I will give the Minister some advice: take the hint and drop it.

defencetechnologylabour-market
58
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Unusually as I moved the new clause, I am not proposing to press it to a vote, because I hope that the point has been made. I hope that the Liberal Democrats, who tabled it, will not argue with that.

defencetechnologylabour-market
40
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I have been here too long to argue with the Chair, but I am doing so, Mr Efford, because the new clause is about retention. My question is: why are more people joining the Navy and the Air Force than are leaving, and why are more people leaving the Army than joining? I believe that the troubles Bill is the fundamental

defencetechnologylabour-market
62
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The hon. Gentleman pre-empts me; I notice that he said “into the armed forces”, not “into the Army”. I will come on to why that is the case in a minute. As he says, quarter by quarter, more people are joining the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force than are leaving, and the Opposition welcome that. But the latest annual

defencetechnologylabour-market
352
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the motion. Clause, by leave, withdrawn. New Clause 6 National Veterans’ Commissioner (England) “After section 366 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 insert— ‘366A National Veterans’ Commissioner (England): establishment (1) Within 12 months of the passing of the Armed Forces Act 2026, the Secr

defencetechnologylabour-market
402
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

defencetechnologylabour-market
5
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Well, explain the letter from the regimental associations.

defencetechnologylabour-market
8
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

As I said, I am not going to press the new clause. I just leave the Minister with this thought: if what I am saying is completely wrong, how does he explain that letter from his own mates?

defencetechnologylabour-market
38
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

It is very clear that the hon. Member for North Durham basically implied that we are aligned with the Russians. That is a despicable thing to say.

defencetechnologylabour-market
27
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

As I understand it, it is not merely a Government decision; it is partly a concession that is offered by the railway industry. Some uncertainty has been put to us that, as we transition to GB Railways, which is to be a holding organisation for the railway network, there may be some changes to concessionary fares. What

defencetechnologylabour-market
147
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

For the absolute avoidance of doubt, I never said that, and the hon. Gentleman is putting words in my mouth. I never said, or even implied, that our armed forces are a laughing stock—absolutely not. They are still, man for man and woman for woman, among the best in the world, if not the best. It is the Government they

defencetechnologylabour-market
199
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Thank you.

defencetechnologylabour-market
2
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

What does that have to do with it?

defencetechnologylabour-market
8
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

That is twice now.

defencetechnologylabour-market
4
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am so sorry, but will the Minister give way?

defencetechnologylabour-market
10
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

In fairness to the hon. Gentleman, I will meet him halfway. I could get him references from Hansard for where the Opposition made exactly that point in the Chamber some weeks ago. We argued that, obviously, there would be expenditure at Faslane, at Lossiemouth and suchlike, so if the Government did not come up with the

defencetechnologylabour-market
390
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Well, Mr Efford, if the Chancellor signed it, there would not be any criticism. For whatever ends, she has not chosen to do so. When we had exchanges with the Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry yesterday about defence spending, to which the drip—the DIP, rather—is fundamental, he gave the game away. He talked

defencetechnologylabour-market
317
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. This is the last new clause we will debate today, so I will try to keep to the point. New clause 17 would require the Government to publish a defence readiness plan, which must include information about the numbers and readiness of reserve forces. In a sense, the ne

defencetechnologylabour-market
807
← PreviousPage 2 of 29 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.