Speeches by Murphy.
Every Hansard contribution by Luke Murphy this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 601–620 of 784 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “When they were denying that they could help and were referring you back to the installer, what reason were you given by TrustMark and the accredited provider for not sending someone?” | 31 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “So you would have been provided with the figures from Ofgem, and you would have known that there was that percentage of issues.” | 23 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Was it not publicly available?” | 5 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Was that 10% figure of failure not available?” | 8 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Are the guarantee agencies such as the Cavity Insulation Guarantee Agency—CIGA—and the Installation Assurance Authority fit for purpose, Andy?” | 19 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “What I am getting at is that I think that in your answer to Claire, the suggestion was that the problem with ECO4 was the multiple measures. But the data from Ofgem suggests that it was not to do with the multiple measures, because they were single measures in ECO1. If TrustMark did not have that data, had not looked a…” | 88 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “What I am getting at is that I think that in your answer to Claire, the suggestion was that the problem with ECO4 was the multiple measures. But the data from Ofgem suggests that it was not to do with the multiple measures, because they were single measures in ECO1. If TrustMark did not have that data, had not looked a…” | 88 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Was that 10% figure of failure not available?” | 8 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Was it not publicly available?” | 5 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “So you would have been provided with the figures from Ofgem, and you would have known that there was that percentage of issues.” | 23 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “You took over the technical reporting, I understand, from Ofgem in 2020.” | 12 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “There has been a bit of discussion, in particular with Claire, on previous schemes. In 2015, Ofgem found that about 10% of installations under ECO1 failed their first quality checks. In Northern Ireland, the 2019 report found that there was a 63% fault rate with cavity wall insulation installed in social housing. Can w…” | 77 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “I have a very quick question, and I should acknowledge that Simon and I have met before because TrustMark is based in my constituency. Earlier, you said that are responsible for holding the scheme providers to account, but Zak made it quite clear that they were not being held to account. He was being constantly sent ba…” | 96 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Thank you. Amanda, I will come back to you in a moment. Shabir, from your experience, how common a story is this, where people are referred back to the installer by the accreditation schemes or TrustMark? Following a complaint, how common is it to get someone on site to see what the issues are?” | 54 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Thank you. I want to come back to you, Amanda, because it sounds as though your situation was different in that you do not even know who installed you.” | 29 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Can you say a bit about your experience and how you went about making the initial complaint?” | 17 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Have you had any interaction with the accreditation bodies?” | 9 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “Beginning with Zak and going along the panel, how can the redress system be improved? What would you want to see? It has happened and you need to make a complaint. How could the process be significantly improved from where it is now?” | 43 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “There has been a bit of discussion, in particular with Claire, on previous schemes. In 2015, Ofgem found that about 10% of installations under ECO1 failed their first quality checks. In Northern Ireland, the 2019 report found that there was a 63% fault rate with cavity wall insulation installed in social housing. Can w…” | 77 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 453) “I have a very quick question, and I should acknowledge that Simon and I have met before because TrustMark is based in my constituency. Earlier, you said that are responsible for holding the scheme providers to account, but Zak made it quite clear that they were not being held to account. He was being constantly sent ba…” | 96 |