The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,057 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 141160 of 1,057 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 8 of 53Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

It is about the combination of those concerns, along with the fact that there are unrepresented people. The Minister is right to say that people who have representation, if their appeals are valid, will be able to carry on, because they will continue to meet the test. The reason the Opposition support the broader appro

crime
162
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

On amendment 37, I have talked about the high rate of error and injustice that is being corrected by the current appeal mechanism, and I have talked about the unrepresented defendants who will have to navigate a more complex and subjective system, such as by reviewing transcripts. On the whole, we do not think that we

crime
152
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

We must give great weight to the evidence we have heard, but the Government’s own position is that it is unlikely to materially change outcomes; they are repealing a provision that their own assessment concedes will not make a material difference to what happens.

crime
44
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

As the Minister said, we are considering the next iteration of the question of admissibility, which addresses the evidentiary rules regarding previous false complaints in sexual offence cases. This is a sensitive area of criminal law where the pursuit of truth must be carefully balanced against the need to protect comp

crime
683
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

Forgive me if it is published, but if not, perhaps the Minister could write to the Committee on the current state of video technology across the court estate, to support the Bill’s progression.

crime
33
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I understand the Minister’s criticism that the defendant making the appeal may be perfectly content to have their case reheard in the magistrates, and insisting that an appeal be reheard in a jury trial gives no flexibility in that direction—that is a fair point. In response, we will not press amendments 55 to 57 to a

crime
102
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

The Minister was absolutely right to point to the enormous burden on those judges. I should have made a similar observation, and I am happy to do so now. Although I have been critical of some of their decisions, I cannot imagine the weight that sits with some of those people all the time, so I want to put on the record

crime
234
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

The Minister has pointed to complaints, and that is an important element, but there is something in between complaints and legal appeal. Again, from my own experience, working extensively on trying to make quality improvements in healthcare, these are incredibly complex things that we expect experts to do. Someone migh

crime
359
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

If the defendant is successful at appeal, we might say that they are doubly aggrieved: they have gone through the process and it has not worked for them. Surely we should want to do everything we can to support that group of people, so that they have a route to the mode of trial that they think is fairest, considering

crime
72
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

As we have discussed in debates on previous amendments, the grounds of an appeal may very well relate to an allocation decision. Someone could successfully appeal on the basis that their trial should never have been heard by a magistrate and that they should have had a jury instead. Providing the option for a jury retr

crime
106
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

“power is also never concentrated in the hands of one individual.”

crime
11
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I accept the Minister’s point that to insist on that being the remedy is not necessarily what the defendant would want. We absolutely want to support defendants who have been through the process of a trial and a successful appeal. Where they could have had a Crown court trial with a jury, prior to the Government’s refo

crime
79
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I rise to speak in support of clause 20, which is a technical and geographic provision necessitated by the significant infrastructure developments currently under way in the City of London. As new law courts are developed, specifically at the Salisbury Square site—we mentioned the specialist fraud court earlier in the

crime
301
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

crime
0
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

crime
0
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I hope that I have demonstrated to the Committee that I have a genuine interest in the suggestion that this element is causing an issue. We are open-minded to that. My instinct is that, at heart, this is about the courts, judges and other professional staff making bad decisions and bad judgments. That is at the heart o

crime
109
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

crime
0
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I think it is a drafting habit to say “his”, and there is no pejorative element to that.

crime
18
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

It notes that those factors are already considered informally, but consistently codifying them would improve the quality of decision making without removing the principle of parental responsibility. On hearing those factors, I think all of us would say that, if a court went through that process properly, credibly and w

crime
80
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

The suggested amendment wording that was submitted in evidence by Both Parents Matter would be a new paragraph (h) in section 1(3) of the Children Act 1989, reading:

crime
28
← PreviousPage 8 of 53 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.