The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,029 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 121140 of 1,029 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 7 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

The Minister was absolutely right to point to the enormous burden on those judges. I should have made a similar observation, and I am happy to do so now. Although I have been critical of some of their decisions, I cannot imagine the weight that sits with some of those people all the time, so I want to put on the record

crime
234
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

The Minister has pointed to complaints, and that is an important element, but there is something in between complaints and legal appeal. Again, from my own experience, working extensively on trying to make quality improvements in healthcare, these are incredibly complex things that we expect experts to do. Someone migh

crime
359
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

We must give great weight to the evidence we have heard, but the Government’s own position is that it is unlikely to materially change outcomes; they are repealing a provision that their own assessment concedes will not make a material difference to what happens.

crime
44
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I rise to speak in support of clause 20, which is a technical and geographic provision necessitated by the significant infrastructure developments currently under way in the City of London. As new law courts are developed, specifically at the Salisbury Square site—we mentioned the specialist fraud court earlier in the

crime
301
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I had considered thinking of a question for every single amendment, but I elected against that. I speak in support of clause 18 and schedule 3. While the provisions may not generate the same level of public debate and scrutiny as the Bill’s earlier clauses regarding the restriction of jury trials, they carry significan

crime
465
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

As the Minister points out, this clause interacts with the issue of transparency in the justice system. I recognise that the Minister thinks it attempts to strike a balance by clarifying the categories of people who may not be excluded, such as representatives of news organisations, witness supporters and approved rese

crime
540
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

If the defendant is successful at appeal, we might say that they are doubly aggrieved: they have gone through the process and it has not worked for them. Surely we should want to do everything we can to support that group of people, so that they have a route to the mode of trial that they think is fairest, considering

crime
72
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I accept the Minister’s point that to insist on that being the remedy is not necessarily what the defendant would want. We absolutely want to support defendants who have been through the process of a trial and a successful appeal. Where they could have had a Crown court trial with a jury, prior to the Government’s refo

crime
79
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I understand the Minister’s criticism that the defendant making the appeal may be perfectly content to have their case reheard in the magistrates, and insisting that an appeal be reheard in a jury trial gives no flexibility in that direction—that is a fair point. In response, we will not press amendments 55 to 57 to a

crime
102
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

On amendment 37, I have talked about the high rate of error and injustice that is being corrected by the current appeal mechanism, and I have talked about the unrepresented defendants who will have to navigate a more complex and subjective system, such as by reviewing transcripts. On the whole, we do not think that we

crime
152
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

As we have discussed in debates on previous amendments, the grounds of an appeal may very well relate to an allocation decision. Someone could successfully appeal on the basis that their trial should never have been heard by a magistrate and that they should have had a jury instead. Providing the option for a jury retr

crime
106
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

“power is also never concentrated in the hands of one individual.”

crime
11
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

In summary, clause 7 represents a substantial recasting of appellate rights that prioritises administrative throughput over the correction of error. We should not trade away, without any evidence of abuse and with little evidence of meaningful efficiency savings, a safeguard that is successfully correcting mistakes in

crime
66
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

crime
0
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

crime
0
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

crime
0
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I must address some of the evidence that the Government relied on. The Ministry of Justice published its review on the presumption of parental involvement in October last year. Both Parents Matter, the charity that has been working for some 52 years on shared parenting and that helpfully sat on the advisory group for t

crime
108
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I hope that I have demonstrated to the Committee that I have a genuine interest in the suggestion that this element is causing an issue. We are open-minded to that. My instinct is that, at heart, this is about the courts, judges and other professional staff making bad decisions and bad judgments. That is at the heart o

crime
109
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

The justice system depends on the belief that mistakes can and will be fixed. By restricting access to appeals and forcing successful cases back into the summary system, we risk creating a parallel system that simply displaces the backlog, while degrading the quality of justice. We must maintain the automatic right to

crime
85
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

On the basis of that discussion, the Opposition do not oppose the clause. We can explore the issue on a good faith basis. I do not think it is critical to the importance of the Bill, so we are happy to proceed. We would, however, welcome some further clarity.

crime
49
← PreviousPage 7 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.