The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,057 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 841860 of 1,057 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 43 of 53Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Fourth sitting)

I would like to make two points. First, on the drafting, I appreciate that the Government are ultimately responsible for the wording of legislation, but I gently say that perhaps the Minister might review this with her officials. The wording of the amendment was taken from the previously approved drafting of a similar

crimesocial-care
317
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Fourth sitting)

We return to consider the measures on parental responsibility. There was significant debate in our earlier sitting on the need to balance the measures, and the official Opposition and the Liberal Democrats both moved amendments to widen the Bill’s scope in ways that I think would have been proportionate and necessary t

crimesocial-care
483
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

The Minister made heroic efforts to explain the logic and context of how we ordinarily deal with these matters. We think the prohibited steps orders are an important enhancement for the safeguarding of children, but I cannot imagine a scenario, even in circumstances in which the offence has not been found proven, in wh

crimesocial-care
184
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

With respect, there is not a victim. The person has been acquitted, and there is not a child that has suffered anything, any more than if the person was found not guilty in the first place. I respect the Minister’s comments on how the amendment might be better drafted, but the Government have to accept that they are in

crimesocial-care
107
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

Can the Minister give me any other example in our legal system where someone who has suffered a consequence directly as a result of a conviction that is then overturned is required to take further steps to unpick a consequence that flows from that overturned conviction? I cannot think of any. If someone is exonerated,

crimesocial-care
101
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I beg to move amendment 19, in clause 3, page 6, line 20, leave out from “not” to end of line 25 and insert “ceases to have effect if the offender is acquitted of the offence on appeal. (5A) A prohibited steps order made under this section does not cease to have effect if the sentence is reduced, on appeal, so that it

crimesocial-care
334
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

We all recognise that this is a novel measure. I do not think that anyone is suggesting introducing a blanket measure. For example, we have used the custodial threshold as a narrowing measure and the Liberal Democrats have used a serious sexual offence as a narrowing measure. The Minister is talking about the balance t

crimesocial-care
106
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

The Minister has a wealth of colleagues around her who are covering these issues, including—as I understand it—the Home Office Minister responsible for safeguarding, the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, the hon. Member for Birmingham Yardley (Jess Phillips). What does this Minister say to the Home Offi

crimesocial-care
92
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I rise to speak in support of our amendments 17 and 18. As has been said, the Bill currently requires prohibited steps orders, which remove parental responsibility, only for those receiving custodial sentences of four years or more, and only if they have parental responsibility for the victims of those offences. In the

crimesocial-care
499
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I absolutely accept that it will not always be the case, but does the Minister accept that some people will not be bothered by those measures and will be able simply to use noise to escape accountability?

crimesocial-care
37
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

Does the Minister accept that, unamended, this measure will simply require an offender to make a lot of noise in order to get out of all the things that she is saying about them actually being at the hearing? Sanctions are there, but in terms of them actually being at the hearing, all they will have to do is make some

crimesocial-care
62
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

As I have said very clearly, I am a shadow Justice Minister now, and the new shadow Secretary of State and I make justice policy. I am not afraid to go further than previous Governments, and I will not be restrained by what they did. I did not make those previous policies; it was not my decision how they were enacted.

crimesocial-care
618
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I thank the Minister for her response. She says that judges will have the powers they need. As I think I clearly explained, those powers might be helpful in some circumstances, but for the very worst offenders—the kind that have been in the news and have caused us to think more clearly about this issue, in particular t

crimesocial-care
68
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

If the hon. Member wants to suggest where else such restraint might benefit victims and their families, I will absolutely support his case if I think it is legitimate. As I have said, my focus and the balance I want to strike is, as far as possible, in favour of victims and their families, and it is not about overly co

crimesocial-care
348
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

Absolutely, and it would be for the judge to decide in all circumstances whether it is appropriate. I will be happy after this sitting to send the footage from that case, and the evidence of someone successfully being gagged by having tape placed over their mouth. This is really simple stuff that is being done in other

crimesocial-care
74
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I absolutely believe that people will be violent, which is why we tabled amendment 15 to ensure that officers are able to use the level of force necessary to compel offenders to attend. If we do not do that, what are we going to achieve? The kinds of offenders who have brought this issue to our attention will be more t

crimesocial-care
117
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

Absolutely. It surprises me that Members think it is a novel concept when it has been on the statute book for quite some time. We want to ensure that the individuals tasked with using force to bring offenders to court have the legal protections they need in order to act with confidence. We do not want offenders to thin

crimesocial-care
453
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

As I said, it is on the statute book as a legally defined term. I struggle to understand why Members think it is on the statute book without any meaning. I have not heard any plans from the Government since the election to remove it.

crimesocial-care
45
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Member for Gloucester is chuntering; would he like to intervene? Did I say something that was factually incorrect?

crimesocial-care
20
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I direct the hon. Lady to the statute book and to the case law that has evolved around that phrase. If the courts, this Government or our previous Government did not think it was a meaningful distinction, I do not know why we would have it on the statute book. It was introduced to provide the greatest possible benefit

crimesocial-care
107
← PreviousPage 43 of 53 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.