The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,029 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 821840 of 1,029 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 42 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I rise to speak in support of our amendments 17 and 18. As has been said, the Bill currently requires prohibited steps orders, which remove parental responsibility, only for those receiving custodial sentences of four years or more, and only if they have parental responsibility for the victims of those offences. In the

crimesocial-care
499
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I absolutely accept that it will not always be the case, but does the Minister accept that some people will not be bothered by those measures and will be able simply to use noise to escape accountability?

crimesocial-care
37
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

Does the Minister accept that, unamended, this measure will simply require an offender to make a lot of noise in order to get out of all the things that she is saying about them actually being at the hearing? Sanctions are there, but in terms of them actually being at the hearing, all they will have to do is make some

crimesocial-care
62
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

As I have said very clearly, I am a shadow Justice Minister now, and the new shadow Secretary of State and I make justice policy. I am not afraid to go further than previous Governments, and I will not be restrained by what they did. I did not make those previous policies; it was not my decision how they were enacted.

crimesocial-care
618
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I thank the Minister for her response. She says that judges will have the powers they need. As I think I clearly explained, those powers might be helpful in some circumstances, but for the very worst offenders—the kind that have been in the news and have caused us to think more clearly about this issue, in particular t

crimesocial-care
68
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

If the hon. Member wants to suggest where else such restraint might benefit victims and their families, I will absolutely support his case if I think it is legitimate. As I have said, my focus and the balance I want to strike is, as far as possible, in favour of victims and their families, and it is not about overly co

crimesocial-care
348
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

Absolutely, and it would be for the judge to decide in all circumstances whether it is appropriate. I will be happy after this sitting to send the footage from that case, and the evidence of someone successfully being gagged by having tape placed over their mouth. This is really simple stuff that is being done in other

crimesocial-care
74
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I absolutely believe that people will be violent, which is why we tabled amendment 15 to ensure that officers are able to use the level of force necessary to compel offenders to attend. If we do not do that, what are we going to achieve? The kinds of offenders who have brought this issue to our attention will be more t

crimesocial-care
117
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

Absolutely. It surprises me that Members think it is a novel concept when it has been on the statute book for quite some time. We want to ensure that the individuals tasked with using force to bring offenders to court have the legal protections they need in order to act with confidence. We do not want offenders to thin

crimesocial-care
453
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

As I said, it is on the statute book as a legally defined term. I struggle to understand why Members think it is on the statute book without any meaning. I have not heard any plans from the Government since the election to remove it.

crimesocial-care
45
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Member for Gloucester is chuntering; would he like to intervene? Did I say something that was factually incorrect?

crimesocial-care
20
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I direct the hon. Lady to the statute book and to the case law that has evolved around that phrase. If the courts, this Government or our previous Government did not think it was a meaningful distinction, I do not know why we would have it on the statute book. It was introduced to provide the greatest possible benefit

crimesocial-care
107
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

It is a pleasure to open this further debate on clauses 1 and 2. In our debate on amendments 13 and 14, we considered how we could improve the way a decision is taken. It is disappointing that Labour MPs did not feel they wanted victims and their families to have a statutory right to be heard in relation to that decisi

crimesocial-care
192
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

I beg to move amendment 15, in clause 1, page 2, line 2, leave out from “force,” to end of line, and insert— “so long as it is not grossly disproportionate.”

crimesocial-care
31
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Fourth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 20, in clause 3, page 7, line 4, leave out from “and” to end of line 9. This amendment is linked to Amendment 22.

crimesocial-care
29
18 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Member raises an important point. That is why amendment 23 specifically includes a duty to consult victims and their family members on the use of the power. We heard evidence, which I had anticipated, that some victims and their families will not want to see the offender. That is why the judge should consult t

crimesocial-care
705
16 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Second sitting)

Q I want to ask about victim personal statements, commonly referred to as victim impact statements. I have spoken to victims of crime who have been told that they have to change their victim statements, perhaps if they are making personal remarks about the offender. We have introduced an amendment that would minimise t

crime
381
16 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (First sitting)

Q Hello. I am Dr Kieran Mullan, shadow Justice Minister. I want to begin with the unduly lenient sentence scheme. Obviously, you will work directly with victims, and the outcome of all your work will be a sentence passed by a judge. I know from personal experience that, privately, the police can sometimes be just as fr

crimesocial-care
331
16 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Second sitting)

Q I now turn to something more clearly focused on the specialist areas in which you work, which is parental responsibility. The Bill introduces a measure that means that if someone is convicted of a child sexual offence related to children for whom they have parental responsibility and they are sentenced to four years

crime
362
16 Jun 2025Victims and Courts Bill (Second sitting)

Q Finally, one welcome measure in the Bill flips around the concept of where offenders can go and where victims are protected from seeing them, because it should be the offenders that we restrict. We should restrict their mobility so that victims can know that as long as they are not in certain places they will not run

crime
426
← PreviousPage 42 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.