Keir Starmer.

Keir Starmer's most pressing story right now is not legislation but scrutiny of his own conduct. In April, Labour imposed a three-line whip to defeat a Commons motion that would have referred him to the Privileges Committee over allegations he misled the House about Peter Mandelson's appointment as US Ambassador — specifically, whether proper security vetting was followed. Starmer voted with his party to block the referral, arguing the opposition was jumping ahead of an ongoing document-release process. That vote landed alongside a run of hostile news coverage: outlets highlighted that Starmer had called six times for Boris Johnson to resign for misleading Parliament, a parallel his critics have pressed hard. Recent local coverage includes organised constituency protests over Palestine, welfare, and migration policy, and polling cited by one outlet suggesting he could lose his Holborn and St Pancras seat at the next election.

His parliamentary participation rate is strikingly low — just 6% of votes cast — which reflects his role as Prime Minister rather than a backbench voting record. On the votes he has taken, he is a 100% party-line voter with no rebel votes since entering the Commons in 2015. His 2,825 speech contributions span economy, defence, health, and cost-of-living debates, with defence appearing prominently despite negative coverage arguing his rearmament commitments are more performative than substantive.

The context is unusual: almost all data here describes a sitting Prime Minister rather than a constituency MP, so low participation and zero committee roles are structural, not indicative of disengagement. News sentiment over the past 90 days averages a negative score across 59 articles, with MP-performance coverage notably hostile. Voting data is thin — only 36 votes — limiting confident conclusions about his policy priorities beyond those listed above.