Holborn and St Pancras.

Starmer's most pressing parliamentary story right now is the April vote on whether to refer him to the Privileges Committee over allegations he misled Parliament on Peter Mandelson's appointment as US Ambassador. He voted against the referral -- as expected -- but the episode attracted significant hostile coverage, including a widely circulated piece cataloguing six instances where he demanded Boris Johnson resign for the same offence. Separately, constituency protests over his government's positions on Palestine, welfare and migration have drawn press attention, and polling cited by left-wing outlets suggests his Holborn and St Pancras seat could be vulnerable at the next general election.

His voting record, however, is almost invisible by parliamentary standards. A 7% participation rate -- against a Commons average closer to half of all votes -- reflects the convention that a serving Prime Minister rarely tramps through the division lobbies. When he does vote, he is 100% aligned with his party. His handful of recent votes cover the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, tuition fee increases, and Fair Work Agency powers. Speeches are a different matter: 2,638 contributions in 90 debates place him among the most active voices in the chamber, spanning the economy, defence, health, and cost of living.

The data here captures a Prime Minister rather than a conventional backbencher, so low vote participation is structurally expected rather than a sign of disengagement. His news sentiment across 215 articles averages mildly negative, dragged down by 52 pieces on his personal performance -- the most critical cluster in the dataset. He sits on no select committees, which is standard for a serving PM. Speech data is available and extensive; vote data is limited by the role.