Speeches by Glen.
Every Hansard contribution by John Glen this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 661–680 of 1,449 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “With the greatest respect, that is not the point I am making. I totally agree with you that it must be their decision. I am saying that the combined aggregate economic value of those intra-city transport schemes is less significant in terms of the national growth mission overall, and that there are better decisions tha…” | 85 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “Sure.” | 1 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “I remember it well. We are addicted to it.” | 9 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “What happens if they don’t?” | 5 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “I understand. Thank you.” | 4 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “Can I ask about the additional capital spending? I think £23 billion of the additional £44 billion that has been allocated between 2023-24 and 2029-30 is going on defence and net zero, so there is a 48% real-terms increase in the capital budget for defence and a 140% increase for energy and net zero. That high proporti…” | 112 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “They would have to find cuts in other line items within their own budget, because no other money is available.” | 20 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “Well, I think that is what we are saying—we will have to wait and see. But there is no measure to arbitrate on that; it is a judgment.” | 28 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “No, what I am saying is that spending money locally has a different economic outcome from national infrastructure projects that do not involve one particular region or a combined series of regions. Rishi Sunak came as a Back Bencher to see Philip Hammond when I was Philip’s PPS, and he said he wanted to do freeports. T…” | 125 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023) “I do not think I have been very clear, but what I am trying to get at is the arbitration between the relative value of delegated expenditure and centrally driven infrastructure or other stimulants from capital expenditure from the centre.” | 40 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Professor Lawrence, could I clarify what you meant in terms of the regulators’ budgets? My understanding is that the PRA and the FCA, in financial services, for example, are funded from levies. They determine their own budgets on a business plan and so on and are scrutinised by this Committee and others.” | 52 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Thank you; that is really helpful.” | 6 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Turning to the insurance industry, clearly the amount of data points that exist for different individuals allows companies to form a different profile and understanding of risk, which has quite significant implications in terms of the loss of pooling, the anatomisation of a market and the offering of different position…” | 155 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Professor Andreeva, do you have anything to add?” | 8 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Is there not a significant risk that if we do not have more intervention in this area, we will actually have market providers diminishing as their data confidence levels over risk levels for some cohorts in society become so high? That imperative around privacy actually gives them the right not to offer a service in or…” | 63 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Regulators and Governments are always very reticent to put imperatives to the tech companies for fear of over-regulation.” | 18 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Yes, quite.” | 2 |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Just to clarify, Professor Wachter, do you see the regulators doing enough at the moment to deal with the evolving risk in terms of the use of this often protected data?” | 31 |
| 18 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806) “Thank you.” | 2 |
| 18 Jun 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806) “On the National Wealth Fund. There is a well-rehearsed argument about its similarities to the UK Infrastructure Bank. What do you discern to be different about what the new Government have done with this entity?” | 35 |