The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,449 contributions

Speeches by Glen.

Every Hansard contribution by John Glen this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 641660 of 1,449 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 33 of 73Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
29 Jun 2025 Glastonbury Festival: BBC Coverage

I thank the Secretary of State for her statement—I agree with practically everything she has said. When I heard these reports, I thought of the Mayor of Wilton, Councillor Alexandra Boyd, who is Jewish, and about what it would have felt like for her to have watched that with her family. We in this place all understand

culture-communitycrime
151
29 Jun 2025Welfare Reform

Yes, we were in power for 14 years, and during covid, when I was a Minister, we made decisions such as stopping face-to-face assessments because we could not do them. We all recognise that the recovery from that covid time has not gone as well as it should, but if the Secretary of State cannot deliver a shift in the nu

economy-jobssocial-carelabour-market
86
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

Well, I think that is what we are saying—we will have to wait and see. But there is no measure to arbitrate on that; it is a judgment.

28
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

I certainly get the point about there being a consensus between the previous Government and this one on devolving decision making. How do you avoid a situation where you create lots of happy people outside London, with local mayors who are given more discretion to make growth-enhancing investments within their terms of

126
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

With the greatest respect, that is not the point I am making. I totally agree with you that it must be their decision. I am saying that the combined aggregate economic value of those intra-city transport schemes is less significant in terms of the national growth mission overall, and that there are better decisions tha

85
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

Why the universal 10%?

4
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

No, what I am saying is that spending money locally has a different economic outcome from national infrastructure projects that do not involve one particular region or a combined series of regions. Rishi Sunak came as a Back Bencher to see Philip Hammond when I was Philip’s PPS, and he said he wanted to do freeports. T

125
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

They would have to find cuts in other line items within their own budget, because no other money is available.

20
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

Gemma Tetlow from the IFG talked about the uniform 10% administrative budget cuts. If you are doing a zero-based review, as Mr Dean said, it is a holistic opportunity to consider first principles: what are we doing and what are we not doing? How do you justify what appears to be, and what Ms Tetlow appeared to say was,

87
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

I do not think I have been very clear, but what I am trying to get at is the arbitration between the relative value of delegated expenditure and centrally driven infrastructure or other stimulants from capital expenditure from the centre.

40
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

Your officials would dispute it.

5
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

How do we, as a Committee, and the public verify the added value of the Office for Value for Money, given that its advice to you is private?

28
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

With regard to the Chair’s point about public scrutiny, what will that look like to the outside?

17
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

Mr Smewing, I will just put it on record that I never had a problem with the work of your team and did not feel the need for additional advice.

30
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

But forgive me, Chief Secretary, if you are going to make good on that collaborative approach to the settlement being arrived at, presumably you need distinctly different processes for measuring the progress in collaborative expenditure to outcomes. How much did the core functions that exist across Whitehall and in the

109
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

We want all of Government to spend money efficiently and demonstrate that the spending review is leading to better outcomes in terms of what the spending does. The question I really want to get at is: do you plan to do anything differently in the Treasury in terms of monitoring the effectiveness of the decisions about

62
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

I hope it will. What I am trying to get at is that you can collaborate in the bit before and allocate to spend money better, but as a Committee we need to measure whether that collaborative spending effort is leading to better outcomes.

44
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

But can I ask one further tight question on the departmental delivery plans? They have identified, I think, annual efficiency savings of £14 billion by 2028-29. How will it be verified that they have been achieved? What is the tangible, clear evidence that that number will be met by that time?

51
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

I am delighted that you think you are doing so much better than anything that has come before.

18
25 Jun 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1023)

What happens if they don’t?

5
← PreviousPage 33 of 73 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.