Speeches by Norman.
Every Hansard contribution by Jesse Norman this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 141–160 of 717 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “How many civil servants are there in your organisation, Rupert?” | 10 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “So the point is, this is really an “in principle” matter. You have not put any numbers around it yet. That is part of the next phase.” | 27 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Pari passu, it would be 5,000, but—” | 7 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “How many civil service employees do you have at the moment?” | 11 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “It sounds like whistling in the wind by the Treasury, frankly. This does not feel like a real thing, because you have not been adequately consulted, and there is no scale on it. We will have to see.” | 38 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “That is nicely put. I am sure you will not want to respond to this, but could you give us some sense of numbers and workforce reduction? Presumably, there will be more people at higher pay, and fewer at lower because of the displacement effect—how is that going?” | 48 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “You could get a double.” | 5 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Is it 0.1% additional demand? What level are we talking about?” | 11 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “That in and of itself ought to deliver a lot of what the permanent secretary is talking about.” | 18 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “It is just slightly odd, because if it is supplying demand alongside sovereign spend, it is astounding to me that it would not have had a closer relationship with your office—the National Armaments Director—because you are deciding how much kit needs to be provided and when, against a particular demand signal. It has n…” | 90 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Because its capabilities and processes start to displace legacy ones that are more—” | 13 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Not military costs, and not non-civil service, non-military workforce costs—is there a non-civil service workforce? I am just trying to work out what you are cutting out.” | 27 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Just a final question, which is that the SDR talked about a commitment to reduce MoD civil service costs by a minimum of 10% by 2030, and to do so by using artificial intelligence and automation. Obviously, the drive for simplicity and accountability is enormously welcome, but can you give us a sense of how that is goi…” | 77 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “MDM is the new vehicle.” | 5 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “That would include a counter-drone capability, as well as drones.” | 10 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Presumably, you try to indigenise the application of the technology, even if you could not indigenise the core technology, so it became part of our sovereign—” | 26 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “So you have not been consulted either.” | 7 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “And companies could borrow in order to supply the demands made by MoD for more kit. Is that right?” | 19 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “How do you think about foreign companies where we know that the ultimate loyalty of the company will not be to British interests, and where the IP is not held as a sovereign matter in this country?” | 37 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “An emphasis for you would be on placing your bets—your investment—as National Armaments Director more on the sovereign side of that equation, if you can, for relevant capability.” | 28 |