Speeches by Norman.
Every Hansard contribution by Jesse Norman this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 101–120 of 660 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “You never know, based on this performance.” | 7 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Will there be metrics by which we can start to see that happening next year?” | 15 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Air Marshal, last week we saw a significant briefing in three different newspapers against CDS. Can you recall this ever happening to a serving commanding officer at a time of conflict?” | 31 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “So you might take the benefit in capability rather than in production?” | 12 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “So an awful lot of back-office change could deliver a quite meaningful reduction in numbers as well as a reduction in costs?” | 22 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “That is helpful. Thank you.” | 5 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “How many civil servants are there in your organisation, Rupert?” | 10 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Pari passu, it would be 5,000, but—” | 7 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “It sounds like whistling in the wind by the Treasury, frankly. This does not feel like a real thing, because you have not been adequately consulted, and there is no scale on it. We will have to see.” | 38 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “How many civil service employees do you have at the moment?” | 11 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “That is nicely put. I am sure you will not want to respond to this, but could you give us some sense of numbers and workforce reduction? Presumably, there will be more people at higher pay, and fewer at lower because of the displacement effect—how is that going?” | 48 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “So the point is, this is really an “in principle” matter. You have not put any numbers around it yet. That is part of the next phase.” | 27 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “You could get a double.” | 5 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Is it 0.1% additional demand? What level are we talking about?” | 11 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “That in and of itself ought to deliver a lot of what the permanent secretary is talking about.” | 18 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Because its capabilities and processes start to displace legacy ones that are more—” | 13 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Not military costs, and not non-civil service, non-military workforce costs—is there a non-civil service workforce? I am just trying to work out what you are cutting out.” | 27 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “It is just slightly odd, because if it is supplying demand alongside sovereign spend, it is astounding to me that it would not have had a closer relationship with your office—the National Armaments Director—because you are deciding how much kit needs to be provided and when, against a particular demand signal. It has n…” | 90 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “Just a final question, which is that the SDR talked about a commitment to reduce MoD civil service costs by a minimum of 10% by 2030, and to do so by using artificial intelligence and automation. Obviously, the drive for simplicity and accountability is enormously welcome, but can you give us a sense of how that is goi…” | 77 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1776) “That would include a counter-drone capability, as well as drones.” | 10 |