The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 203 contributions

Speeches by Thornberry.

Every Hansard contribution by Emily Thornberry this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 203 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 11Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
25 Feb 2026Engagements

On a point of order, Mr Speaker.

economy-jobseducationcost-of-living
7
25 Feb 2026 Diego Garcia and British Indian Ocean Territory

Could the Minister please assure the House that international law will apply to Diego Garcia, by way of either the ownership or the use of Diego Garcia, either by our military or by the Americans?

defenceeconomy-jobs
35
24 Feb 2026Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-24)

We have signed each other’s forms.

6
24 Feb 2026Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-24)

It would not be for me to tell Members how they should take this opportunity. The reason I put it broadly is because there are so many opportunities in a debate such as this. I am just suggesting the sort of things that there would be. I would like to talk about Britain being a force for good and how, at a time like th

146
24 Feb 2026Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-24)

Just don’t rise to it, Matt. It’s not worth it.

10
24 Feb 2026Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-24)

Can I stay and hold Matt’s coat because I am very supportive of him?

14
24 Feb 2026Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-24)

Of course.

2
24 Feb 2026Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-24)

I completely agree with the International Development Committee Chair. I have no doubt that this will take up a portion of whatever debate there is, if there is to be one. I have applied for a debate on the Foreign Office as a whole before, because, while the world is on fire, we are seeing in the Foreign Office the bi

644
9 Feb 2026 Standards in Public Life

On a point of order, Mr Speaker.

mp-performancecrimeother
7
9 Feb 2026Jimmy Lai: Prison Sentence

Jimmy Lai is 78. He has rotting teeth. He has diabetes, heart issues, and recently he has visibly been losing weight. He has now been sentenced to 20 years. It is effectively not a life sentence, but a death sentence. I urge the Chinese authorities to end this elderly man’s appalling ordeal, and I would ask that they e

defenceculture-community
95
9 Feb 2026 Standards in Public Life

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for his statement and for telling us that relevant direct ministerial appointments, including politically appointed diplomatic roles where the appointee will have access to highly classified material, will have to pass the requisite national security vetting process before such app

mp-performancecrimeother
202
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Throughout my contribution, I have tried to explain the attempts that the Foreign Affairs Committee has made. The most important thing is that we asked several times. We asked straightaway in January, and we asked in February. We asked many times to have Lord Mandelson in front of the Committee, because we would have b

mp-performancedefenceother
183
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

No, it is given to those who are making the decisions—as I understand it. The due diligence is done by the Cabinet Office. It does due diligence on a number of candidates, and then the decision is made as to which candidate will be put forward. Then it is announced. Then the vetting is done by the Foreign Office, and t

mp-performancedefenceother
104
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

The point is that the due diligence and vetting are done by civil servants and are not supposed to involve politicians, and the decision was made in No. 10. That is how it works, as I understand it, so the views of the then Foreign Secretary may not be directly relevant.

mp-performancedefenceother
51
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Again, for the record, I asked the Cabinet Secretary why he was not prepared to give that information to us, and he gave two reasons: first, because he felt that he had a duty of care to the candidate; and secondly, because he was not going to put information about his advice to No. 10 into the public realm. I think th

mp-performancedefenceother
104
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

I will not take any more interventions. I have explained what our Committee was told about due diligence and how that happened. Normally what would then happen is that an interview would be done with a panel, and questions that arose during due diligence would be put to the candidate during that interview. But that did

mp-performancedefenceother
348
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

I think I have made it clear that, for me, there is a difference between being a friend of someone who is accused of something and then putting distance between oneself and that person if they are then convicted. I think a decision should be made at that point. That goes to a matter of conscience and the right way to p

mp-performancedefenceother
66
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Seven Members are seeking to intervene. If I may, I will perhaps take two interventions.

mp-performancedefenceother
15
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

I thank the hon. Gentleman. Yes, I have read the letter—I am afraid I did not have it at my fingertips—but I think it is important to put all this information before the House. The next question is, what does “vetting” mean? I appreciate that there are other processes that we cannot go into here, and it would not be ap

mp-performancedefenceother
158
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

I understand what the right hon. Lady is saying. Obviously, I do not know. All I can do to help the House is point out that when it was announced in mid-December that Lord Mandelson would be the ambassador, pressure was being applied to make sure that we were all clear that he was going to be the ambassador in time for

mp-performancedefenceother
124
← PreviousPage 2 of 11 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.