The Westminster lensArchive · Written questions · 38 tabled · 32 answered

Written questions by Hazelgrove.

Every parliamentary written question tabled by Claire Hazelgrove this session, with the full answer and department. Back to the MP page.

Department:All (38)Department of Health and Social Care (7)Department for Education (6)Treasury (5)Department for Work and Pensions (5)Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (3)Ministry of Defence (2)Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (2)Ministry of Justice (2)Home Office (2)Department for Transport (2)Department for Culture, Media and Sport (1)Department for Business and Trade (1)

Showing 12 of 2 · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

9 Jul 2025·Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government·Answered
Asked

Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of discrepancies between voter identification documents and electoral register entries caused by (a) failure to update identification documents of a change of surname following marriage (b) other named-related reasons on trends in the level of voter participation; and what steps her Department is taking to communicate the need for identification documents to match the electoral register for future elections.

Reply

As set out in the Elections Act 2022, where there is a discrepancy between the name shown on an elector’s identification document and how their name is recorded on the electoral register, that elector may still use that document if they are able to explain the discrepancy to the satisfaction of the presiding officer, and may provide further evidence (e.g. a marriage certificate) when doing so This information is set out on poll cards and is displayed in polling stations. No assessment has been made on the potential impacts that such discrepancies might have on levels of voter participation.

3 Jun 2025·Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government·Answered
Asked

Communities and Local Government, what steps she plans to take to introduce (a) protections and (b) support mechanisms for leaseholders living in buildings under 11 meters.

Reply

Irrespective of building height, we consider it imperative to support leaseholders, and ensure that fire safety risks are assessed and, if necessary, remediation action is taken promptly.The department continues to review cases where cladding remediation work is proposed, which includes undertaking audits of fire risk appraisals of external walls to make sure that proposed works are necessary and proportionate. We also press managing agents and building owners not to pass on costs to leaseholders and explore cost recovery options.

Sources
SourceUK Parliament Members API
MethodQuestion and answer text as published. Question preamble (“To ask the…”) trimmed for readability; answers shown in full.