The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 366 contributions

Speeches by Kearns.

Every Hansard contribution by Alicia Kearns this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 6180 of 366 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 4 of 19Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

We have heard about the threats from Iran to our country. We know how the Chinese Communist party has put bounties on the heads of pro-democracy Hongkongers—cash for the abduction of people as young as 19, kidnap notes put through the doors of neighbours saying, “Bring this person to the Chinese embassy so that we can

defencecrimetechnology
94
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

New clause 7 enshrines designation as grounds for sanction. It does not impose anything automatic, and neither does it ask for a running commentary on sanctions—Government lawyers can rest easy—but it gives the Bill a bridge to a second or third designation, not just the first. Amendment 15 builds directly on that brid

defencecrimetechnology
104
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

There is a blind spot at the centre of the Bill—a consequence of writing it for one organisation and forgetting that there will be more state bodies that behave as terrorists. The Bill does not mention sanctions once. For legislation the entire purpose of which is to act against hostile state bodies, there is a remarka

defencecrimetechnology
129
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Amendment 15 is not a demand that the Government sanction anyone. The amendment deliberately ensures that designations and sanctions do not drift apart due to inattention. If the Government are serious that the power should be used agnostically against bodies not yet sanctioned, they would welcome a discipline that for

defencecrimetechnology
55
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Section 33 of the NSA already names some hostile acts, including sabotage, the theft of trade secrets and entering a prohibited premises. If the Act can name those examples, it can find the room to name transnational repression. This is the chance to improve the National Security Act, protect the vulnerable and put aut

defencecrimetechnology
56
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

That is precisely the point that I made in my opening speech. The Government are saying that it is not legitimate to engage with these bodies. Of course they want a carve-out to protect Crown servants, but that is explicitly included in the Bill. What they are doing, essentially, is creating a carve-out whereby people

defencecrimetechnology
114
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I have been very clear that we must stand by our Jewish communities. Yesterday, I sat down with the Jewish Leadership Council, the Community Security Trust and representatives of other organisations. They do not recognise the need to rush this Bill through the House, and they want us to scrutinise it in order to close

defencecrimetechnology
118
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The second power that the Bill withholds is the serious crime prevention order. Again, terrorism law already allows it, but this Bill does not, which is why I tabled new clause 6. A serious crime prevention order lets a court manage risk beyond the conviction, limiting travel, restricting internet access, controlling c

defencecrimetechnology
93
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

One of the powers that the Government could look to take—outside this Bill, because it is not within its scope—would be to give the Charity Commission the power to wind up a charity. It currently does not have that power, but we can be absolutely certain that states are creating brand new charities across our country s

defencecrimetechnology
91
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of whom we have spoken much, recommended the power last year. He said that it was an immediate recommendation, and the Government rightly accepted it. I welcomed them doing so, but now the Government have left it out of the Bill. The equivalent power against terrorism has work

defencecrimetechnology
84
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The reality is that an individual such as that would not be captured, because they would have diplomatic protections under the Vienna conventions. I admit that I have not been able to find an amendment that would correct that. That is why we have scrutiny of the House, because the shadow Front Bench is not the sole arb

defencecrimetechnology
720
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

We support the ambitions in the Bill, we want the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to be designated, and we want the Bill on the statute book, so the Government will find no enemies on our Benches today—only an Opposition determined to ensure that this law protects our people and our country. That is not a cause that

defencecrimetechnology
1,433
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill (Allocation of Time)

Let me be clear from the outset that the Opposition support the Bill and want it on the statute book, but we cannot support the manner in which the Government are seeking to pass it. This motion, for something that seeks to make a permanent change to the criminal law of our country, was laid only late on Tuesday, and w

defencemp-performance
179
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I welcome the Minister to her place for the first time, and I wish her every success in a vital role in our country and in the Government. Let me end where I began. We support this Bill and will not push its Second Reading to a vote, because its principle is sound. The power is overdue, and the Government are right to

defencecrimetechnology
1,788
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Yes, the law specifically covers UK citizens who then travel abroad to commit a crime in support of these proscribed groups. However, it explicitly states that that does not apply if they are planning the crimes here in the UK and they happen abroad, unless it is prejudicial to the safety of the UK. It would be very st

defencecrimetechnology
203
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I am not sure that anyone has disputed that Jonathan Hall backs the Bill. I had a lengthy call with him to discuss the gaps in the Bill, which I am sure the hon. Gentleman has not had. I will not share a private conversation, but I encourage the hon. Gentleman to have a similar call with Jonathan Hall to discuss those

defencecrimetechnology
673
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The Bill asks how our country confronts the greatest threat it faces: states that behave like terrorists. We support the Bill, and have today set out its weaknesses—the places where, as drafted, it is found wanting. We tabled 13 amendments and new clauses, with not one designed to delay the Bill, not one designed to wr

defencecrimetechnology
110
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 1 ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 2 Offences relating to designated bodies Amendment proposed: 3, page 3, line 8, leave out from “body” until end of line 9.—(Alicia Kearns.) This amendment and Amendments 4 to 6 would remove t

defencecrimetechnology
74
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right to want this. However, there is already a requirement under law for Jonathan Hall, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, to review all terrorism legislation and related legislation, including the National Security Act 2023—which this would fall under—every single year

defencecrimetechnology
73
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

defencecrimetechnology
0
← PreviousPage 4 of 19 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.