The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 364 contributions

Speeches by Kearns.

Every Hansard contribution by Alicia Kearns this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 4160 of 364 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 3 of 19Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Yes, the law specifically covers UK citizens who then travel abroad to commit a crime in support of these proscribed groups. However, it explicitly states that that does not apply if they are planning the crimes here in the UK and they happen abroad, unless it is prejudicial to the safety of the UK. It would be very st

defencecrimetechnology
203
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The Bill asks how our country confronts the greatest threat it faces: states that behave like terrorists. We support the Bill, and have today set out its weaknesses—the places where, as drafted, it is found wanting. We tabled 13 amendments and new clauses, with not one designed to delay the Bill, not one designed to wr

defencecrimetechnology
110
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I move from the offences that the Bill omits to the powers it withholds from our police and the officers standing at the border. New clause 5 closes one of the starkest gaps between the Bill and the terrorism law that the Secretary of State clearly said she seeks to mirror: “the same as” was the language she used. If a

defencecrimetechnology
109
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

We grant that exact power in terrorism cases. Parliament created the provision in 2015 so that an officer at the border does not have to watch a suspect board a plane and vanish. On 29 March 2024, two men stabbed Pouria Zeraat, a journalist with Iran International—an incredibly brave man who continues to do everything

defencecrimetechnology
107
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The second power that the Bill withholds is the serious crime prevention order. Again, terrorism law already allows it, but this Bill does not, which is why I tabled new clause 6. A serious crime prevention order lets a court manage risk beyond the conviction, limiting travel, restricting internet access, controlling c

defencecrimetechnology
93
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

defencecrimetechnology
0
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Finally, I come to the threat that the Bill cannot even bring itself to name. Hostile states, and the bodies that serve them, will use any tool they can to silence dissent, subvert democracy, and advance their interests, particularly in those who sought safety in our country—Tibetans, Hongkongers, Ukrainians and Britis

defencecrimetechnology
71
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I have been very clear that we must stand by our Jewish communities. Yesterday, I sat down with the Jewish Leadership Council, the Community Security Trust and representatives of other organisations. They do not recognise the need to rush this Bill through the House, and they want us to scrutinise it in order to close

defencecrimetechnology
118
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Amendment 16 names three of the most common and most sinister forms of attack by hostile states: transnational repression, abusive lawfare and sanctions evasion. It would be the first time that transnational repression was put into British law. That may seem like an amazing, glaring omission to many Members of this Hou

defencecrimetechnology
130
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

We have heard about the threats from Iran to our country. We know how the Chinese Communist party has put bounties on the heads of pro-democracy Hongkongers—cash for the abduction of people as young as 19, kidnap notes put through the doors of neighbours saying, “Bring this person to the Chinese embassy so that we can

defencecrimetechnology
94
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

We support the Bill. We are not trying to stop it. I hope that I have made the case clearly that we just want to plug the gaps. I do not think it is fair for the Government to suggest that we are trying to use this Bill like a Christmas tree and hang lots of additional items on it. I seek simply to close existing gaps.

defencecrimetechnology
92
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

defencecrimetechnology
0
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

To conclude, I will draw these threads together. Every one of these 13 amendments is drawn not from theory, but from the body of counter-terrorism law that this country has built, tested and relied upon for two decades. Apart from the transnational repression suggestion, every measure is taken from terrorism legislatio

defencecrimetechnology
151
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

“17D Self-directing acts in support of a designated body

defencecrimetechnology
9
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

One of the powers that the Government could look to take—outside this Bill, because it is not within its scope—would be to give the Charity Commission the power to wind up a charity. It currently does not have that power, but we can be absolutely certain that states are creating brand new charities across our country s

defencecrimetechnology
91
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Clause 2

defencecrimetechnology
2
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

defencecrimetechnology
0
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

defencecrimetechnology
0
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

Offences relating to designated bodies

defencecrimetechnology
5
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

The Minister gives the example of a diplomat, and she is right that our diplomats in Tehran will need to engage with the IRGC—it is nonsense to suggest that they would not be able to do so—but that is why there is a specific exception for that in the Bill. Proposed new section 17A(5) refers to a person who “acts for or

defencecrimetechnology
138
← PreviousPage 3 of 19 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.