Regulation and Enforcement.
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 225 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 80 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 26 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +17 | 67% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Jun 2026 | Draft Clean Air Zones Central Services (Fees) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support the fee increase and extension of the clean air zone central services scheme, accepting that higher charges are needed to move toward full cost recovery and that clean air zones deliver measurable public health benefits. · No: Oppose the fee increase as excessive — either because it places unfair burdens on motorists and councils (Conservative position) or because the 100% rise is disproportionate to the stated 14% funding shortfall (Liberal Democrat position). | 263 | 88 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Regulation and Enforcement” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.