A divisionDivision No. 27 · Tuesday, 16 June 2026· Commons· air-quality

Draft Clean Air Zones Central Services (Fees) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026

262Ayes
86Noes
Carried · majority 176 · Government won
296 did not vote
Aye262No86DID NOT VOTE · 296

644 Members · Aye 262 · No 86 · DNV 296 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 16 June 2026 to approve regulations doubling the fee that local authorities in England pay per transaction to use the national clean air zone digital infrastructure, from £2 to £4, and extending the scheme's licensing period from March 2027 to March 2031. The vote passed by 262 ayes to 86 noes. The regulations are set to take effect from 1 September 2026. This was Division 27. The change moves the fee arrangement closer to full cost recovery for running the central digital services that underpin clean air zones, which charge older and more polluting vehicles to enter designated areas in cities. Seven English local authorities currently operate such zones, including Bath, Birmingham, Bristol, Bradford, and areas of Tyneside. Ministers framed the increase as necessary to reduce the gap between what local authorities pay and what the scheme actually costs to run. Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour, with 251 voting aye and none against. All 80 Conservative MPs who voted opposed the regulations. The Green Party's five MPs voted with the government. The Liberal Democrats and the Democratic Unionist Party also voted against. Reform UK's two voting members opposed it. The vote did not produce significant cross-party alliances or notable rebellions within any party.

Voting Aye meant
Support the fee increase and extension of the clean air zone central services scheme, accepting that higher charges are needed to move toward full cost recovery and that clean air zones deliver measurable public health benefits.
Voting No meant
Oppose the fee increase as excessive — either because it places unfair burdens on motorists and councils (Conservative position) or because the 100% rise is disproportionate to the stated 14% funding shortfall (Liberal Democrat position).
§ 01Who voted how.348 voting Members · 296 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted Aye
225
0
135
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted No
0
80
36
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted Aye
26
0
16
Independent
4
2
7
Reform UK
0
2
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Gregor PoyntonSupportiveLivingston
Moved all five motions for approval of delegated legislation on behalf of the government.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech
Matt WesternQuestioningWarwick and Leamington
Raised concerns about inflammatory language used by Conservative leadership, specifically referencing Liz Badenoch's alleged comparison of a Labour minister to a Gestapo officer, and called for a reduction in hostile rhetoric.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (140 words)
Caroline NokesNeutralRomsey and Southampton North
As Deputy Speaker, ruled that comments made outside the Chamber are not a matter for the Chair's authority, though acknowledged the point had been placed on the record.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (40 words)
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0