Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 323 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 86 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 66 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 35 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +28 | 78% on-whip · 8 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | -50 | 0% on-whip · 7 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Plaid Cymru | Plaid | +50 | 100% on-whip · 4 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Jun 2026 | Draft Carbon Budget Order 2026 Aye: Support adopting the carbon budget, backing the UK's legally binding emissions reduction commitments and the net zero framework. · No: Oppose the carbon budget order, either rejecting the pace or ambition of emissions targets or challenging the economic costs of the net zero trajectory. | 331 | 94 | Yes |
| 22 Apr 2026 | Draft Energy Prices Act 2022 (Extension of Time Limit) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support extending government powers to intervene in energy markets and help households with energy costs, while accepting that some savings come from shifting costs to taxation rather than eliminating them · No: Oppose extending these emergency energy market intervention powers, likely on grounds of fiscal transparency or scepticism about the government's approach to managing energy costs | 380 | 7 | Yes |
All 2 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “energy-policy” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.