A divisionDivision No. 501 · Wednesday, 22 April 2026· Commons· Energy

Draft Energy Prices Act 2022 (Extension of Time Limit) Regulations 2026

380Ayes
7Noes
Carried · majority 373 · Government won
263 did not vote
Aye380No7DID NOT VOTE · 263

650 Members · Aye 380 · No 7 · DNV 263 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on 22 April 2026 to approve the Draft Energy Prices Act 2022 (Extension of Time Limit) Regulations 2026, passing the measure by 380 votes to 7. The regulations extend the time limit within which ministers can use powers granted by the Energy Prices Act 2022, a piece of emergency legislation originally passed to allow government intervention in energy markets during the period of acute price volatility that followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Energy Prices Act 2022 gave the government sweeping temporary powers to cap energy prices, subsidise household and business bills, and intervene in energy market arrangements. These powers were designed with a built-in expiry to ensure parliamentary oversight of emergency measures. By extending the time limit, Parliament is ensuring that ministers retain the legal authority to act swiftly if energy prices surge again, without needing to pass fresh primary legislation. This affects households and businesses across the United Kingdom who could benefit from government intervention should wholesale energy prices rise sharply. The vote was overwhelmingly cross-party, with Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Co-operative Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voting in favour. The only opposition came from four Reform UK MPs and one Ulster Unionist MP, making it one of the most lopsided divisions of recent months. This sits in a broader context of ongoing parliamentary debate about energy policy, with a related opposition day motion on oil and gas in March 2026 producing a much sharper party divide of 297 to 108, suggesting that while the retention of emergency energy powers commands near-consensus support, the broader direction of energy and fossil fuel policy remains genuinely contested.

Voting Aye meant
Support extending the government's legal powers to manage and reduce energy costs for households and businesses, including flexibility over how renewable energy policy costs are funded
Voting No meant
Oppose the extension, raising concerns about transparency and whether the public are being given an honest account of the true cost of government energy policies
§ 01Who voted how.387 voting Members · 263 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
280
0
81
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
53
0
19
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
27
0
15
Independent
5
1
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
4
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Martin McCluskeySupportiveInverclyde and Renfrewshire West
Government supports extending the time limit to continue removing 75% of RO costs from household bills and funding them through general taxation as a progressive measure, while maintaining renewable generator incentives.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,606 words)
Greg SmithNeutralMid Buckinghamshire
Opposition will not divide on the instrument but challenges the government's transparency in presenting the policy as a £100+ saving when costs are merely relocated from energy bills to tax bills, and criticises lack of support for businesses.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (566 words)
Gareth SnellQuestioningStoke-on-Trent Central
Supports the regulations but uses the opportunity to press the Government to use the extended powers under section 9 of the Act to provide immediate support for the 4,500 energy-intensive manufacturing businesses not covered by the industry supercharger scheme.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,385 words)
Claire YoungSupportiveThornbury and Yate
Supports extending the regulations to protect households but calls on Government to do more for off-gas heating households and energy-intensive small businesses, including VAT relief on heating oil and price cap mechanisms.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (321 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0