A divisionDivision No. 501 · Wednesday, 22 April 2026· Commons· Energy

Draft Energy Prices Act 2022 (Extension of Time Limit) Regulations 2026

380Ayes
7Noes
Carried · majority 373 · Government won
263 did not vote
Aye380No7DID NOT VOTE · 263

650 Members · Aye 380 · No 7 · DNV 263 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 22 April 2026 to approve the Draft Energy Prices Act 2022 (Extension of Time Limit) Regulations 2026, passing by 380 votes to 7. The regulations extend the Secretary of State's powers under the Energy Prices Act 2022 for a further period, giving ministers continued legal authority to intervene in energy markets and manage how the costs of energy policies are charged to households and businesses. The extension matters because several active measures rely on these powers. The government has already moved 75% of renewables obligation scheme costs for domestic supply from consumer bills to Exchequer funding, and has closed the Energy Company Obligation scheme, replacing it with Exchequer-funded home upgrades under the warm homes plan. Without the extension, ministers would lose the legal tools to maintain or adapt these interventions. The powers also cover potential support for non-domestic, energy-intensive industries, though no specific scheme for businesses has yet been announced under them. Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party and the Social Democratic and Labour Party all voted in favour. Reform UK provided four of the seven no votes, with one independent and one Ulster Unionist also voting against. The Conservative opposition did not vote against the instrument, with their spokesperson Greg Smith explicitly stating they would not divide the committee, while still raising concerns about whether the government's claimed bill savings give the public an accurate picture of the true costs involved.

Voting Aye meant
Support extending government powers to intervene in energy markets and help households with energy costs, while accepting that some savings come from shifting costs to taxation rather than eliminating them
Voting No meant
Oppose extending these emergency energy market intervention powers, likely on grounds of fiscal transparency or scepticism about the government's approach to managing energy costs
§ 01Who voted how.387 voting Members · 263 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted Aye
280
0
81
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
53
0
18
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted Aye
27
0
15
Independent
5
1
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Voted No
0
4
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Your Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Martin McCluskeySupportiveInverclyde and Renfrewshire West
Government supports extending the time limit to continue removing 75% of RO costs from household bills and funding them through general taxation as a progressive measure, while maintaining renewable generator incentives.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,606 words)
Greg SmithNeutralMid Buckinghamshire
Opposition will not divide on the instrument but challenges the government's transparency in presenting the policy as a £100+ saving when costs are merely relocated from energy bills to tax bills, and criticises lack of support for businesses.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (566 words)
Gareth SnellQuestioningStoke-on-Trent Central
Supports the regulations but uses the opportunity to press the Government to use the extended powers under section 9 of the Act to provide immediate support for the 4,500 energy-intensive manufacturing businesses not covered by the industry supercharger scheme.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,385 words)
Claire YoungSupportiveThornbury and Yate
Supports extending the regulations to protect households but calls on Government to do more for off-gas heating households and energy-intensive small businesses, including VAT relief on heating oil and price cap mechanisms.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (321 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0