Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 254 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 81 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 63 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 29 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +36 | 86% on-whip · 7 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun 2026 | Draft Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) (Amendment) Order 2026 Aye: Support reintroducing the supplementary vote system for mayoral elections, arguing it gives elected mayors a broader democratic mandate · No: Oppose the change, preferring first past the post as a simpler and more straightforward voting system, and objecting to reversing a previous Conservative reform | 359 | 87 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Electoral Integrity” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.