Counter-terrorism and Radicalization.
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | 0 | 50% on-whip · 223 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | 0 | 50% on-whip · 82 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | 0 | 50% on-whip · 56 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | 0 | 50% on-whip · 26 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | -50 | 0% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | 0 | 50% on-whip · 4 MPs | |
| Plaid Cymru | Plaid | -50 | 0% on-whip · 4 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: New Clause 3 Aye: Support adding the new clause, which introduces oversight mechanisms but raises concerns it could restrict judicial review or court challenges to government decisions made under the legislation. · No: Oppose the new clause in its current form, likely on grounds that it inadequately protects access to justice or human rights safeguards against future government misuse. | 143 | 244 | No |
| 17 Jun 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 13 Aye: Support Amendment 13 to the National Security (State Threats) Bill, the precise effect of which is not discernible from the available debate record · No: Oppose Amendment 13, likely reflecting the government's position that the Bill as drafted already strikes the right balance on security powers, oversight, and human rights compliance | 137 | 258 | No |
All 2 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Counter-terrorism and Radicalization” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.