Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 262 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 91 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | -50 | 0% on-whip · 50 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 32 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | -10 | 40% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | -50 | 0% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | -50 | 0% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Jun 2026 | Draft Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support accelerating the phase-out of direct farm subsidies to fund environmental and sustainable farming schemes, accepting that the transition away from the old EU model must continue at pace. · No: Oppose the speed of subsidy cuts, arguing farmers face a cliff edge as replacement environmental schemes are not yet fully available or funded, risking serious harm to farm businesses already under financial pressure. | 302 | 155 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Agricultural Support” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.