Draft Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2026
302Ayes
155Noes
Carried · majority 147 · Government won190 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 302 · No 155 · DNV 190 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 3 June 2026 to approve the Draft Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2026, which set the rate at which direct farm subsidy payments will be cut in England for 2026 and 2027. The regulations passed by 302 votes to 155. They impose reductions of up to 98% on the first tranche of payments farmers previously received, limiting payouts on the first £30,000 tranche to a maximum of £600 per year by 2026. The vote accelerates the phase-out of delinked payments, the successor to EU-era direct subsidies paid to landowners largely based on land area, with the aim of redirecting that money to environmental land management schemes (ELMS) that reward sustainable food production, soil health, pollinator recovery and nature restoration. Supporters argue the old subsidy model failed to address underlying farm profitability and environmental challenges. Critics warned that replacement schemes are not yet fully available or adequately funded, creating what the Liberal Democrats described as a "cliff edge" for farmers already facing rising costs from fuel, fertiliser and increased employer national insurance contributions. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 294 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the regulations, as did the four Green MPs and a handful of smaller party and independent MPs. All 91 Conservative MPs who voted, all 51 Liberal Democrats, all five Reform UK MPs and all five Democratic Unionist Party MPs voted against. There were no notable cross-party rebellions in either direction.
Voting Aye meant
Support accelerating the phase-out of direct farm subsidies to fund environmental and sustainable farming schemes, accepting that the transition away from the old EU model must continue at pace.
Voting No meant
Oppose the speed of subsidy cuts, arguing farmers face a cliff edge as replacement environmental schemes are not yet fully available or funded, risking serious harm to farm businesses already under financial pressure.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.
Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted Aye
262
0
98
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
Voted No
0
50
21
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted Aye
32
0
10
Independent
—
2
3
8
Reform UK
Voted No
0
5
3
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division
The acceleration of delinked payment reductions is necessary to fund environmental schemes and achieve food security; the transition was always planned and the money is being reinvested in farmer support.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,298 words) →
The government is cutting delinked payments far too quickly—reducing annual payments from £30,000 to £600—without adequate replacement schemes in place, creating a cash-flow crisis for farmers already burdened by the family farm tax and higher national insurance.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,309 words) →
While concerned about farm profitability and the challenges facing arable farming, supporting the regulations is essential to address structural weaknesses and ensure a sustainable future for farming after Brexit.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (502 words) →
England is accelerating payment withdrawal before replacement schemes are ready or adequately funded, creating a cliff edge for farmers; an additional £1 billion investment in the farming budget is needed.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (365 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0