Inquiry · Opened 12 June 2025

Higher Education and Funding: Threat of Insolvency and International Students

From: Education Committee

Open12 documents6 evidence sessions

What this inquiry is asking

Can England's universities survive financially, or are some heading for insolvency? This inquiry examines the structural funding crisis in higher education—frozen tuition fees worth less in real terms, declining international student recruitment, rising costs, and inadequate research funding—and asks what happens if major universities collapse, whether government will bail them out, and how the international student visa policy has worsened recruitment. It also scrutinizes the adequacy of student protections and regulatory frameworks.

Status / emerging findings

  • Nearly 75% of higher education providers are in deficit or forecast to be by year-end; 25 universities delayed publishing accounts in 2025, signalling systemic financial distress.
  • £12,000 annual funding gap per student: tuition fees are frozen at £9,535 (worth only £5,935 in 2012 money), while universities subsidise research shortfalls (£5bn annually under-recovered) and cross-subsidise home student teaching with international student fees.
  • OfS Chief Susan Lapworth stated in November 2025 she does not expect a major university to fail in that calendar year, contradicting earlier confidential warnings of potential collapse, but acknowledged 45% of institutions forecast deficits and 14% face low liquidity.
  • Legal framework is inadequate: no special administration regime exists for royal-chartered universities; insolvency would trigger only court-ordered liquidation, not trading-through, leaving no clear process to protect students, staff or regional economies.
  • International student restrictions (visa policy changes, Basic Compliance Assessment) have reduced recruitment, particularly from China, eliminating the cross-subsidy universities relied on to sustain operations.

Why it matters

University insolvency would devastate regional economies, displace students mid-degree with no legal protection, and signal whether government will bail out higher education or let market forces close institutions—a question with profound implications for research, innovation, and access to higher education.

Tone arc

Inquiry opened procedural and technical (exploring funding mechanisms, governance) but shifted sharply toward crisis framing after April 2025 evidence revealed 75% deficit forecasts and structural £12bn funding gap. October sessions became increasingly urgent after confidential warnings of imminent collapse; final November session moderated slightly when OfS Chief contradicted the collapse narrative, though acknowledged systemic vulnerability.

Themes

structural-funding-gapinternational-student-dependenceregulatory-insolvency-frameworkfrozen-tuition-feesresearch-cost-recoverystudent-protection-gapsvisa-policy-impact

Key witnesses

Baroness Smith of Malvern (Minister), Susan Lapworth (OfS Chief Executive), Professor Malcolm Press CBE (Universities UK Vice-President), Sir Philip Augar (Former Post-18 Education Reviewer), Professor Dame Jessica Corner (Research England), Vivienne Stern MBE (Higher education sector expert), Neil Smyth (Insolvency lawyer, Mills and Reeve LLP), Professor Brian Bell (University leader)

Reports & Government Responses

Witness sessions

Written evidence & correspondence

Themes & actors

Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗

Higher Education and Funding: Threat of Insolvency and International Students | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote