A divisionDivision No. 21 · Wednesday, 10 June 2026· Commons· Rail

Railways Bill Remaining Stages: Amendment 148

155Ayes
279Noes
Defeated · majority 124 · Government won
211 did not vote
Aye155No279DID NOT VOTE · 211

645 Members · Aye 155 · No 279 · DNV 211 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Amendment 148 to the Railways Bill was defeated on 10 June 2026 by 279 votes to 155. The amendment, proposed by opposition MPs, concerned clause 68 of the Bill and would have preserved the ability of the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), the independent rail regulator, to hear appeals on the merits of decisions made by Great British Railways (GBR) about access to the network. Under the Bill as passed, such decisions by GBR can only be challenged through judicial review on procedural grounds. The vote matters because it determines the scope of independent oversight over GBR once the new public body takes control of the rail network. Under the Bill as it now stands, GBR will have the power to decide whether competing operators, including open-access services and freight companies, can access the tracks it also operates. Critics of the clause argued that removing the ORR's ability to rule on the merits of those decisions leaves competing operators with no meaningful route of appeal, concentrating significant power in GBR with limited external check. The amendment's defeat means that structure remains intact. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 266 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, alongside all five Green MPs and all four Plaid Cymru members. The 155 ayes came overwhelmingly from the Conservatives (91) and Liberal Democrats (59), with small numbers from independents, Reform UK, and Restore Britain. The Bill subsequently passed its Third Reading on the same day by 278 votes to 149, confirming the government's position prevailed throughout the remaining stages.

Voting Aye meant
Support restoring the ORR's power to hear substantive appeals against GBR access decisions, protecting open-access operators and freight companies from a body that acts as both competitor and gatekeeper
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the government's Railways Bill as drafted, which limits ORR appeals to procedural irregularity and concentrates access decisions within Great British Railways
§ 01Who voted how.434 voting Members · 211 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
240
120
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
91
0
25
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
58
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
26
16
Independent
3
2
8
Reform UK
Voted Aye
3
0
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted No
0
5
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Keir MatherSupportiveSelby
Moves New Clause 48 on tax consequences of transfer schemes, establishing Treasury regulatory powers for rail restructuring.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (13,161 words)
Nusrat GhaniNeutralSussex Weald
Presents government new clauses and amendments, including Passengers' Charter, accessibility strategy, and rail devolution provisions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (40,683 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0