A divisionDivision No. 20 · Wednesday, 10 June 2026· Commons· Rail

Railways Bill Remaining Stages: Amendment 143

167Ayes
266Noes
Defeated · majority 99 · Government won
210 did not vote
Aye167No266DID NOT VOTE · 210

643 Members · Aye 167 · No 266 · DNV 210 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Amendment 143 to the Railways Bill was defeated on 10 June 2026 by 266 votes to 167. The amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Jerome Mayhew, sought to preserve discounted rail travel for veterans, their families, and passengers aged 26 to 30 by writing existing railcard schemes into statute. The government voted against it, and its majority held. The amendment would have locked current discount railcard arrangements into primary legislation, preventing Great British Railways from altering them without further parliamentary approval. The government's opposition centred on its argument that statutory entrenchment would reduce flexibility. Ministers indicated a preference for allowing GBR to design a simplified offer for the armed forces community rather than preserving the current separation between veteran and family railcards. For passengers aged 26 to 30, and for veterans and their families, the vote determines whether those discounts rest on a statutory guarantee or on administrative discretion. The division followed strict party lines. All 267 Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs who voted backed the No lobby; no Labour MP voted Aye. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, the Greens, Plaid Cymru, and several smaller parties all voted Aye. The result reflected the government's commanding Commons majority rather than any cross-party movement. Mayhew framed the vote as a test of individual Labour MPs' willingness to defy their whips, but no Labour member crossed the floor.

Voting Aye meant
Support writing veteran and 26-to-30 railcard discounts into law, ensuring they cannot be removed by Great British Railways without primary legislation.
Voting No meant
Oppose fixing these specific railcards in statute, arguing flexibility is needed to develop a simpler, broader armed forces discount offer and that existing schemes face no threat of withdrawal.
§ 01Who voted how.433 voting Members · 210 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
241
119
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
58
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
26
16
Independent
3
1
9
Reform UK
Voted Aye
5
0
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Keir MatherSupportiveSelby
Moves New Clause 48 on tax consequences of transfer schemes, establishing Treasury regulatory powers for rail restructuring.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (13,161 words)
Nusrat GhaniNeutralSussex Weald
Presents government new clauses and amendments, including Passengers' Charter, accessibility strategy, and rail devolution provisions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (40,683 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0