Budget Resolution No. 50: Inheritance tax (limiting agricultural and business property reliefs etc)
327Ayes
182Noes
Carried · majority 145 · Government won139 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 327 · No 182 · DNV 139 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on 2 December 2025 to approve Budget Resolution No. 50, which limits agricultural property relief and business property relief for inheritance tax purposes. The resolution passed by 327 votes to 182. The measure, drawn from the October 2025 Budget, caps the combined value of assets qualifying for 100% relief at £1 million per individual, with assets above that threshold attracting inheritance tax at a reduced rate of 20% rather than the standard 40%. Agricultural property relief and business property relief have, since the 1980s, allowed farmers and business owners to pass on qualifying assets free of inheritance tax. The government's change means that farms and family businesses worth more than £1 million in qualifying assets will face a tax liability on death for the first time in decades. Payments can be spread over ten years interest-free, but critics argue the change threatens the viability of multi-generational family farms in particular, since agricultural land is capital-intensive but often generates modest income. The Treasury expects the measure to raise significant revenue, targeting what it describes as the accumulation of very large landholdings sheltered entirely from inheritance tax. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 283 Labour MPs who voted, joined by all 38 Labour and Co-operative members who voted, backed the government. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, DUP, Plaid Cymru, and Reform UK member who voted did so against, as did three independents and two of the four Green MPs who voted. The near-total opposition unity across parties that rarely agree reflects the breadth of concern about the farming community's response. The policy has attracted sustained media coverage and farmer protests, and subsequent divisions in January 2026 on related Finance (No. 2) Bill clauses show the government continuing to defend the broader Budget package in committee.
Voting Aye meant
Support limiting inheritance tax reliefs on agricultural and business property, accepting that large farming and business estates should face greater inheritance tax liability
Voting No meant
Oppose limiting these inheritance tax reliefs, arguing it threatens family farms and businesses and risks forcing asset sales to meet tax bills
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
282
1
78
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
60
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
38
0
4
Independent
—
6
3
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
8
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
8
0
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
1
2
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Budget is morally necessary investment to lift children from poverty, rebuild NHS as public service, and tackle public health crisis; lifting two-child cap is paid for by tax avoidance crackdowns and gambling tax.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,668 words) →
Budget is a tax grab on working people without real reform plan; NHS waiting lists falling far too slowly; government failed to resolve strikes and has no credible social care strategy.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,779 words) →
Budget treads water on NHS; unclear how medicine price increases and reorganisation costs will be paid; calls for EU customs union and better GP access rather than tax rises.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,898 words) →
Budget is progressive and fair; lifting two-child cap will reduce child poverty by 500,000; tax reforms on wealthy and investment in employment support are sound policy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (917 words) →
NHS frontline staff at St Thomas' hospital deserve recognition for managing through strikes; government must prevent further strike action.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (89 words) →
Budget lacks growth measures and imposes stealth taxes on working people; freeze on income tax thresholds and EV tax burden rural constituencies disproportionately.Independent · Voted no · Read full speech (714 words) →
Strongly defends two-child cap removal as moral imperative; criticizes Opposition for opposing child poverty relief despite UK being wealthy nation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (543 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0