A divisionDivision No. 345 · Wednesday, 12 November 2025· Commons· Taxation

Opposition Day: Taxes

101Ayes
316Noes
Defeated · majority 215 · Government won
231 did not vote
Aye103No315DID NOT VOTE · 231

648 Members · Aye 101 · No 316 · DNV 231 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 12 November 2025, the House of Commons voted on a Conservative-tabled Opposition Day motion criticising the Labour government's taxation policies. The motion was defeated by 316 votes to 101. Opposition Day motions are debated on days allocated to opposition parties, and while they carry no binding legislative force, they serve as a formal parliamentary statement of criticism or alternative policy. The motion put on record Conservative objections to Labour's approach to taxation, including tax increases introduced since Labour took office. Although the vote itself changes no law, it reflects the political battle lines over fiscal policy at a time when several significant tax measures were moving through Parliament. The debate would have touched on the impact of tax rises on businesses, workers, and public services, with the two main parties disagreeing over whether higher taxes represent a burden on economic activity or a necessary investment in public provision. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 281 voting Labour MPs and 28 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the motion, as did all four Green MPs and two independents, giving the government a comfortable majority. The Conservatives provided 95 of the 101 Aye votes, joined by three Reform UK MPs, one each from the Traditional Unionist Voice, the Ulster Unionist Party, and the Democratic Unionist Party, and two independents. The Conservatives had 21 members absent, while Labour had 81 absent. Plaid Cymru abstained entirely, with all four of their MPs not voting. The motion sits in a broader legislative context in which the government was advancing the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill and the Finance (No. 2) Bill, both of which passed their respective votes in the months that followed.

Voting Aye meant
Support the opposition's position on taxes, likely criticising current government tax policy or calling for specific changes
Voting No meant
Reject the opposition's motion on taxes, defending the government's existing tax policy approach
§ 01Who voted how.417 voting Members · 231 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
281
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
28
14
Independent
2
2
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Sir Mel StrideOpposedCentral Devon
The government has systematically broken tax promises, with employer national insurance rises destroying growth and jobs; spending must be controlled rather than taxes raised further.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,802 words)
James MurraySupportiveEaling North
The government inherited a difficult fiscal situation and tough choices on tax were necessary; the Budget details will be revealed on 26 November and cannot be pre-announced.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,929 words)
Charlie MaynardNeutralWitney
The Conservatives caused lasting economic damage with the mini-Budget; progressive tax measures like bank windfall taxes and customs union reunion with the EU should fund public services instead of raising taxes on workers.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,297 words)
Sam RushworthSupportiveBishop Auckland
Conservative austerity and waste damaged public services; Labour's investment approach and spending controls are necessary to address child poverty, broken NHS, and neglected infrastructure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,756 words)
Stuart AndersonOpposedSouth Shropshire
Tax hikes on employers and high streets are killing growth; the family farm tax and business rates are crippling rural communities and must be reversed.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,655 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Low-income families in areas like Harlow cannot afford private services; tax-funded public investment is essential despite difficult fiscal circumstances.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,663 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0