A divisionDivision No. 266 · Friday, 11 July 2025· Commons· Constitution and Democracy

Motion to sit in private

1Ayes
58Noes
Defeated · majority 57 · Government won
586 did not vote
Aye3No61DID NOT VOTE · 586

645 Members · Aye 1 · No 58 · DNV 586 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 11 July 2025 on a procedural motion to hold its session in private, away from public view. The motion was defeated by 58 votes to 1, with the overwhelming majority of participating MPs voting to keep the session open and publicly accessible. The result was never in serious doubt, with only a single MP supporting the move to close the proceedings. The vote matters because open parliamentary proceedings are a cornerstone of democratic accountability. Sittings in private are exceptionally rare and are generally reserved for matters of national security or other highly sensitive concerns. By rejecting this motion so decisively, the House affirmed that the business before it on this date would remain visible to the public, to journalists, and to constituents who wished to follow how their representatives conduct affairs of state. The politics of this vote were essentially non-partisan. No party voted in favour of the private session as a bloc, and the sole Aye vote came from among the Labour benches rather than from any organised opposition grouping. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Labour and Co-operative members, and the Green Party all voted against. The very low total participation, with 59 MPs voting out of a House of 650, is itself typical of such procedural motions, which are generally treated as formalities to be swiftly disposed of. A nearly identical motion one week earlier, on 4 July 2025, produced the same outcome, with one Aye against 33 Noes, suggesting a pattern of isolated attempts to invoke this rarely used procedure during this parliamentary period.

Voting Aye meant
Support closing the debate to the public and conducting proceedings in private
Voting No meant
Oppose closing the debate to the public, insisting on open and transparent parliamentary proceedings
§ 01Who voted how.59 voting Members · 586 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
3
35
323
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
15
101
Liberal Democrats
0
2
70
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
8
34
Independent
0
0
13
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
0
1
3
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0