A divisionDivision No. 190 · Wednesday, 7 May 2025· Commons· Digital and Technology

Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 21

97Ayes
363Noes
Defeated · majority 266 · Government won
186 did not vote
Aye99No364DID NOT VOTE · 186

646 Members · Aye 97 · No 363 · DNV 186 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament defeated New Clause 21 to the Data (Use and Access) Bill on 7 May 2025, by 363 votes to 97. The amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Dr Ben Spencer, would have required public authorities to record biological sex data accurately and consistently, and would have ensured that digital verification services operated under the Bill used correctly defined sex data rather than conflating sex with gender identity. The vote matters because the Bill establishes a new voluntary register and trust framework for Digital Verification Services, which could be used to grant or verify access to single-sex services. The Conservative amendment argued that if sex and gender data are conflated in the datasets underpinning those services, the digital verification framework could effectively introduce self-identification by default, bypassing existing law. Supporters of the clause pointed to a Supreme Court ruling clarifying that biological sex is the relevant protected characteristic under the Equality Act, and to a review by Professor Alice Sullivan that found widespread inaccuracies in official data collection, including risks to health screening and policing records. The division split sharply along party lines. All 90 Conservative MPs who voted backed the amendment, joined by five Reform UK MPs, one Democratic Unionist Party MP, and two Independents. Every Labour, Labour Co-operative, Liberal Democrat, Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and Green MP who voted went into the No lobby. The government's position was to oppose the clause, arguing that sex and gender data standards should be addressed through consultation and existing regulatory channels rather than fixed in primary legislation at this stage.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring public bodies to collect and use biological sex data accurately, distinct from gender identity, including in digital verification services — reflecting the Supreme Court's ruling that biological sex is the relevant protected characteristic under the Equality Act.
Voting No meant
Oppose this specific legislative requirement, preferring the government to address sex and gender data standards through consultation and existing regulatory channels rather than enshrining a particular approach in primary legislation at this stage.
§ 01Who voted how.460 voting Members · 186 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
264
97
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
55
16
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
2
4
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
5
4
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Chris BryantOpposedRhondda and Ogmore
Government will not legislate piecemeal on AI copyright but will conduct full consultation review and establish taskforce on technical solutions; existing copyright law is robust and does not need clarification.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,168 words)
Dr Ben SpencerSupportiveRunnymede and Weybridge
New clauses 20 and 21 needed for certainty on copyright protection and sex data accuracy; Government should formally restate that copyright law applies to AI models and correct public authority data collection.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,841 words)
Victoria CollinsSupportiveHarpenden and Berkhamsted
Tech companies should lead opt-in systems for creatives rather than expecting creatives to opt-out; technical solutions must be implemented immediately, not delayed.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (2,180 words)
Pete WishartSupportivePerth and Kinross-shire
Generative AI is actively ingesting creative content now; Parliament must act immediately with amendments rather than wait for reports and future legislation.SNP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,235 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Government must make clear commitment that copyright protections benefiting creatives remain unchanged; existing law should be preserved rather than weakened.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,330 words)
Alice MacdonaldQuestioningNorwich North
Reports required within 12 months may be too slow given urgency; Government should expedite timelines for reassurance while accepting need for consultation.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (126 words)
Samantha NiblettQuestioningSouth Derbyshire
Sex data recording must consider impact on trans people and not make them feel forgotten; digital verification services must be inclusive.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,118 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0