Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 21
97Ayes
363Noes
Defeated · majority 266 · Government won186 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 97 · No 363 · DNV 186 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on New Clause 21 during the Report Stage of the Data (Use and Access) Bill on 7 May 2025. The clause was defeated by 363 votes to 97. The proposal was brought forward primarily by Conservative MPs, with small contributions from Reform UK and a handful of independents, while the government and its allies voted against. The vote concerned whether to add stronger restrictions or privacy protections to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, a piece of legislation designed to reform how data is collected, shared and used across public services and the wider economy. Defeating the new clause means the bill proceeds without those additional constraints, leaving the government with broader powers to enable data sharing between public bodies and other organisations. The practical effect is that the framework governing digital government, data use for public services, and related commercial activity will reflect the government's preferred, less restrictive approach. The division fell almost entirely along party lines. All Conservative MPs who voted supported the new clause, joined by five Reform UK members, one Democratic Unionist Party MP and two independents. Every Labour, Liberal Democrat, Labour and Co-operative, SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green MP who voted opposed it, reflecting strong cross-party support for the government's position among parties that would not normally be expected to agree. The vote is part of a sustained legislative battle over this bill, with subsequent divisions in May and June 2025 showing continued conflict between the Commons and the Lords over related data-access provisions, particularly around Amendment 49 in its various iterations.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring public authorities to record biological sex accurately and separately from gender identity, in line with the Supreme Court's ruling on the Equality Act
Voting No meant
Oppose mandating how public authorities record sex data in this legislation, either disagreeing with the approach or preferring to handle this through other means
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
264
97
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
56
16
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
—
2
3
8
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
5
4
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government will not legislate piecemeal on AI copyright but will conduct full consultation review and establish taskforce on technical solutions; existing copyright law is robust and does not need clarification.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,168 words) →
New clauses 20 and 21 needed for certainty on copyright protection and sex data accuracy; Government should formally restate that copyright law applies to AI models and correct public authority data collection.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,841 words) →
Tech companies should lead opt-in systems for creatives rather than expecting creatives to opt-out; technical solutions must be implemented immediately, not delayed.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (2,180 words) →
Generative AI is actively ingesting creative content now; Parliament must act immediately with amendments rather than wait for reports and future legislation.SNP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,235 words) →
Government must make clear commitment that copyright protections benefiting creatives remain unchanged; existing law should be preserved rather than weakened.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,330 words) →
Reports required within 12 months may be too slow given urgency; Government should expedite timelines for reassurance while accepting need for consultation.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (126 words) →
Sex data recording must consider impact on trans people and not make them feel forgotten; digital verification services must be inclusive.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,118 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0