A divisionDivision No. 189 · Wednesday, 7 May 2025· Commons· Digital and Technology

Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19

160Ayes
294Noes
Defeated · majority 134 · Government won
195 did not vote
Aye161No293DID NOT VOTE · 195

649 Members · Aye 160 · No 294 · DNV 195 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 7 May 2025 to reject a Conservative proposal, New Clause 19 in Division 189, that would have required the Secretary of State to conduct a formal review of whether the minimum age at which children can consent to their personal data being processed by social media platforms should be raised from 13 to 16. The proposal was defeated by 294 votes to 160 during the Report Stage of the Data (Use and Access) Bill. The vote matters because it touches directly on how social media companies can collect and use data from teenage users. Under current UK law, children aged 13 and over can consent to platforms processing their personal data, including for targeted advertising and algorithmically curated content. The Conservative new clause would not have changed that age immediately; it would have required the government to examine the practical barriers to raising it to 16. A separate Liberal Democrat proposal, New Clause 1, went further and would have raised the age directly in statute, but that too did not carry the day. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted did so against the amendment, while every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, and Green MP who voted supported it, as did most independents. The Conservative shadow minister Dr Ben Spencer argued that a review was needed to understand enforcement challenges before any change was made, while the Liberal Democrats' Munira Wilson pressed him to explain why his party preferred a review over the more direct change her own new clause proposed. The division sits within broader parliamentary activity on the Data (Use and Access) Bill, which passed through several further contested votes in May and June 2025.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring a government review of raising the digital age of consent from 13 to 16, as a step toward better protecting children from social media harms including targeted advertising and algorithmic content
Voting No meant
Oppose this Conservative-backed review clause, preferring either the government's own consultation approach or more immediate action such as the Liberal Democrats' proposal to raise the age directly
§ 01Who voted how.454 voting Members · 195 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
264
97
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
54
0
17
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
7
2
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Chris BryantOpposedRhondda and Ogmore
Government will not legislate piecemeal on AI copyright but will conduct full consultation review and establish taskforce on technical solutions; existing copyright law is robust and does not need clarification.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,168 words)
Dr Ben SpencerSupportiveRunnymede and Weybridge
New clauses 20 and 21 needed for certainty on copyright protection and sex data accuracy; Government should formally restate that copyright law applies to AI models and correct public authority data collection.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,841 words)
Victoria CollinsSupportiveHarpenden and Berkhamsted
Tech companies should lead opt-in systems for creatives rather than expecting creatives to opt-out; technical solutions must be implemented immediately, not delayed.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,180 words)
Pete WishartSupportivePerth and Kinross-shire
Generative AI is actively ingesting creative content now; Parliament must act immediately with amendments rather than wait for reports and future legislation.SNP · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,235 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Government must make clear commitment that copyright protections benefiting creatives remain unchanged; existing law should be preserved rather than weakened.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,330 words)
Alice MacdonaldQuestioningNorwich North
Reports required within 12 months may be too slow given urgency; Government should expedite timelines for reassurance while accepting need for consultation.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (126 words)
Samantha NiblettQuestioningSouth Derbyshire
Sex data recording must consider impact on trans people and not make them feel forgotten; digital verification services must be inclusive.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,118 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0