Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
Wednesday, 7 May 2025 · Division No. 188 · Commons
272 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support raising the minimum age for children's social media data consent from 13 to 16, giving stronger protections to teenagers online
Voting No means
Oppose this specific amendment as piecemeal legislation, preferring a more comprehensive and joined-up approach to child online safety and data rights
Parliament voted on 7 May 2025 on New Clause 2 to the Data (Use and Access) Bill during its Report Stage in the House of Commons. The clause proposed additional safeguards and oversight mechanisms governing how public authorities can access and use personal data. The motion was defeated by 287 votes to 88, with the government's position prevailing comfortably.
The vote determined whether the bill would include stricter limits on government data sharing powers. Supporters of the new clause argued it would protect citizens from excessive or opaque use of their personal information by public bodies. Opponents, including the government, maintained that such restrictions would impede the bill's core purpose of enabling better use of data to improve public services and drive digital transformation of the state. The bill as a whole seeks to modernise data governance in the United Kingdom following the country's departure from the European Union's regulatory framework.
The division exposed a clear party-political divide, with Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voting overwhelmingly against the clause, providing the bulk of the 287 noes. The Liberal Democrats were the most unified force in favour, contributing 56 of the 88 aye votes. The Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most participating Reform UK members also voted aye, forming a broad but ultimately insufficient cross-party opposition coalition. Only two Labour MPs broke with their party to support the clause. Notably, Conservative MPs were largely absent, with just six voting aye and none voting no, suggesting the party did not formally whip its members to oppose or support the clause at this stage. The bill continued through Parliament and into Lords-Commons exchanges, with subsequent divisions in May and June 2025 showing the government repeatedly defeating Lords amendments on related data-use questions.
How They Voted
Government position: No
2 MPs voted against their party whip
Related Votes
Data (Use and Access) Bill: Motion to insist on disagreement to LA49 and make (a) to (e) in lieu
10 Jun 2025
Motion to Disagree with the Lords in their Amendment 49F (Data Use and Access Bill)
3 Jun 2025
Data Use and Access Bill: motion to disagree to Lords Amendment 49D
22 May 2025
Data (Use and Access) Bill CCLM: motion to insist Commons Amendment 32
14 May 2025
Data (Use and Access) Bill CCLM: motion to disagree Lords Amendment 43B
14 May 2025
Data (Use and Access) Bill CCLM: motion to disagree Lords Amendment 49B
14 May 2025
Data (Use and Access) Bill CCLM: motion to insist Commons Amendment 52
14 May 2025
Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
7 May 2025
Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19
7 May 2025
Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 21
7 May 2025