Data (Use and Access) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
88Ayes
287Noes
Defeated · majority 199 · Government won272 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 88 · No 287 · DNV 272 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 7 May 2025 to reject New Clause 2 to the Data (Use and Access) Bill at Report Stage, by 287 votes to 88. The clause, tabled by Liberal Democrat MP Victoria Collins, would have required operators of web crawlers and AI models to comply with existing UK copyright law when scraping creative works for AI training purposes. The vote concerns one of the most contested questions in technology policy: whether AI companies can use writers', artists', and musicians' work to train their models without permission or payment. The clause's supporters argued it would establish clear rules protecting creators in a new technological context. The government argued the clause was redundant because copyright law already applies to AI training, and that piecemeal legislation risked unintended consequences before a comprehensive solution could be developed. The vote divided largely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 261 Labour MPs who voted backed the government, as did all 24 Labour and Co-operative MPs. The Liberal Democrats provided the bulk of the opposition, with all 56 of their voting MPs backing the clause. They were joined by six Conservatives, six SNP MPs, four Plaid Cymru MPs, four Greens, six Independents, and two Reform UK MPs. The Conservative benches were notable for their near-total absence, with 110 of their MPs recording no vote. The division sits within a longer parliamentary dispute over AI and copyright that continued into subsequent Lords ping-pong votes through May and June 2025.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring AI developers to explicitly comply with copyright law when using creative works for AI training, protecting writers, artists, and other creators from having their work scraped without consent or compensation.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment as unnecessary or unworkable — existing copyright law already applies to AI training data, and piecemeal legislation risks unintended consequences before a comprehensive solution is ready.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
2
261
98
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
6
0
110
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
55
0
16
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
24
18
Independent
—
7
2
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
6
0
3
Reform UK
—
2
0
6
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government will not legislate piecemeal on AI copyright but will conduct full consultation review and establish taskforce on technical solutions; existing copyright law is robust and does not need clarification.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,168 words) →
New clauses 20 and 21 needed for certainty on copyright protection and sex data accuracy; Government should formally restate that copyright law applies to AI models and correct public authority data collection.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,841 words) →
Tech companies should lead opt-in systems for creatives rather than expecting creatives to opt-out; technical solutions must be implemented immediately, not delayed.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,180 words) →
Generative AI is actively ingesting creative content now; Parliament must act immediately with amendments rather than wait for reports and future legislation.SNP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,235 words) →
Government must make clear commitment that copyright protections benefiting creatives remain unchanged; existing law should be preserved rather than weakened.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,330 words) →
Reports required within 12 months may be too slow given urgency; Government should expedite timelines for reassurance while accepting need for consultation.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (126 words) →
Sex data recording must consider impact on trans people and not make them feel forgotten; digital verification services must be inclusive.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,118 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0