A divisionDivision No. 18 · Wednesday, 9 October 2024· Commons· Housing

Renters' Rights Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading

104Ayes
424Noes
Defeated · majority 320 · Government won
119 did not vote
Aye106No424DID NOT VOTE · 119

647 Members · Aye 104 · No 424 · DNV 119 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs rejected a Conservative reasoned amendment (a procedural motion to block a bill's progress) at Second Reading of the Renters' Rights Bill on 9 October 2024, by 424 votes to 104. The amendment would have prevented the Bill from advancing any further through Parliament. Its defeat meant the Bill passed its Second Reading and proceeded to the next legislative stage. The Renters' Rights Bill is one of the most significant reforms to the private rented sector in England in decades. Its central measure is the abolition of section 21 "no-fault" evictions, under which landlords can currently remove tenants without giving a specific reason. Beyond that, the Bill bans rental bidding wars, gives tenants a right to request pets, prohibits landlords from discriminating against tenants with children or on benefits, introduces a mandatory landlord ombudsman scheme, and applies new Decent Homes Standards to private rentals. Rejecting the amendment cleared the path for all of these measures to be scrutinised in detail at later stages. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 312 Labour MPs who voted, all 62 Liberal Democrats, all 35 Labour and Co-operative MPs, and the three Green MPs voted against the amendment, supporting the Bill's progress. All 97 Conservatives who voted backed the amendment. Reform UK's six voting MPs also backed the amendment, as did one MP from Restore Britain and two independents. Seven independents voted with the government. The Bill's passage through Second Reading had been anticipated, given Labour's large majority, but the debate highlighted the contested ground around landlord rights and the court system's capacity to handle possession cases. The previous Conservative government had itself committed to abolishing section 21 in its 2019 manifesto but had not passed the legislation before leaving office.

Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the Renters' Rights Bill, opposing its approach to abolishing no-fault evictions and regulating the private rented sector
Voting No meant
Support the Bill proceeding, backing the abolition of section 21 no-fault evictions and stronger protections for private renters
§ 01Who voted how.528 voting Members · 119 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
312
49
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
97
0
19
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
62
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
2
7
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
1
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Alicia KearnsOpposedRutland and Stamford
The Government has failed to brief the opposition on national security legislation in advance, giving media access hours before laying the Bill, with the opposition briefing scheduled only after amendments close.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (197 words)
Caroline NokesNeutralRomsey and Southampton North
While advance briefing would have been courteous, the Deputy Speaker has no power to compel Ministers to provide it; copies of the Bill are now available.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (267 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0