International Trade Agreements

14 Nov 2024Agriculture & Rural EconomyEconomy & Jobs (General)
Bill EstersonLabour PartySefton Central20 words

11. What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to ensure that future international trade agreements support the farming sector.

Daniel ZeichnerLabour PartyCambridge62 words

Supporting farmers is a priority of this Government. We have been clear that we will protect farmers from being undercut by low welfare and low standards in trade deals. We are also working to reset our relationship with our European friends to strengthen ties and tackle barriers, and helping boost trade to the EU through a UK-EU sanitary and phytosanitary veterinary agreement.

Bill EstersonLabour PartySefton Central59 words

Some farmers benefited from international trade agreements under the previous Government. Unfortunately, it was mostly Australian and New Zealand farmers, not British farmers, who benefited. Will my hon. Friend confirm that this Government will prioritise British farmers who want to export, not least those who want to export to the European Union, through a veterinary agreement with the EU?

Daniel ZeichnerLabour PartyCambridge61 words

My hon. Friend is absolutely right that what happened to the British farming industry was one of the great betrayals of the previous Government. Those trade deals did no credit to our country, but we will take a different approach and develop a much more constructive relationship with our near neighbours. Therefore, the answer to my hon. Friend’s question is yes.

Sir Roger GaleConservative and Unionist PartyHerne Bay and Sandwich49 words

There will be small point in protecting farmers in international trade agreements if Government policy is undermining those same farmers domestically. How many thousands of farmers will it take to clog up Parliament Square next Tuesday before the Government realise that their inheritance tax policy is very deeply flawed?

Daniel ZeichnerLabour PartyCambridge31 words

Once again, I direct right the hon. Gentleman back to the figures from the Treasury, which show that the numbers affected are under 500. That is the answer to his question.