The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Vale of White Horse.

Liberal Democrats-controlled district. £17m net revenue. 24 wards across 3 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats40 councillors · 24 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£17m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,457
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
35/40
Liberal Democrats 88%
Westminster
3
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Liberal Democrats chamber, Liberal Democrats MPs.

Vale of White Horse is a district controlled by Liberal Democrats (35 of 40 seats). Net revenue is £17m for 2025-26. It covers 24 wards spanning 3 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.40 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

LD 35Green 4Con 1

Liberal Democrats 88% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Cheryl Karen BriggsGrnAbingdon Abbey Northcourt2023
Helen PighillsLDAbingdon Abbey Northcourt2023
Andrew John SkinnerLDAbingdon Caldecott2023
Neil FawcettLDAbingdon Caldecott2023
Andrew FoulshamLDAbingdon Dunmore2023
Oliver ForderLDAbingdon Dunmore2023
Eric de la HarpeLDAbingdon Fitzharris2023
Rob MaddisonLDAbingdon Fitzharris2023
Max ThompsonLDAbingdon Peachcroft2023
Mike PighillsLDAbingdon Peachcroft2023
Debra DewhurstLDBlewbury Harwell2023
Hayleigh GascoigneLDBlewbury Harwell2023
Showing 12 of 40·All 40 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

57%
Council tax
£9.6m · median 61%
35%
Central grants
£6.0m · median 26%
8%
Business rates
£1.4m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 57% council tax, 35% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£162
County / upper-tier£1,911
Police£283
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Parish average£100
Total Band-D£2,457

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Vale of White Horse split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Corporate & Central45.7% of net spend · cohort median 27%
18 of 158+70% vs median
Waste & Recycling31.1% of net spend · cohort median 32%
88 of 158-3% vs median
Planning & Economic Development12.3% of net spend · cohort median 14%
100 of 158-15% vs median
Housing & Homelessness7.5% of net spend · cohort median 14%
135 of 158-46% vs median
Culture & Leisure3.6% of net spend · cohort median 13%
141 of 158-73% vs median
Highways & Transport-0.3% of net spend · cohort median -2%
47 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.598 payments · £5.9m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
SOUTH OXFORDSHIRE DIST COUNCIL£2.53m42.9%6
BIFFA MUNICIPAL LTD V17052£1.22m20.7%15
CAPITA BUSINESS SERVICE LTD£0.52m8.8%3
OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL PENSION FUND£0.22m3.8%6
BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LTD£0.13m2.2%5
OXFORD DIRECT SERVICES TRADING LTD£0.11m1.8%13
INNOVATION CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LTD£0.08m1.4%8
OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.08m1.4%3
ASHE CONSTRUCTION LTD£0.07m1.3%2
NHS BUCKINGHAMSHIRE OXFORDSHIRE AND BERKSHIRE WEST INTEGRATED CARE BOARD£0.07m1.2%1

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.24 wards split across 3 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Didcot and Wantage1042% Olly GloverLD
Oxford West and Abingdon1042% Layla MoranLD
Witney417% Charlie MaynardLD
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
598 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level