The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Tendring.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £20m net revenue. 29 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats45 councillors · 29 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£20m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,178
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
19/45
Conservative and Unionist Party 42%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Tendring is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (19 of 45 seats). Net revenue is £20m for 2025-26. It covers 29 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.45 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 19Independent Berwick Hills Resident 13Lab 8LD 4Tendring First 1

Conservative and Unionist Party 42% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Ann WigginsLDAlresford Elmstead2023
Gary ScottLDAlresford Elmstead2023
Zoe Jacqueline FairleyConArdleigh Little Bromley2023
Ian William LennardLabBluehouse2023
James CodlingConBluehouse2023
Graham David SteadyIndBrightlingsea2023
Jayne Beverley ChapmanIndBrightlingsea2023
Mick BarryIndBrightlingsea2023
Chris AmosConBurrsville2023
Mick SkeelsConBurrsville2023
Geeta Dilip SudraIndCann Hall2023
Gina PlaceyIndCann Hall2023
Showing 12 of 45·All 45 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

53%
Council tax
£10.5m · median 61%
31%
Central grants
£6.3m · median 26%
16%
Business rates
£3.2m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy councils (district): 53% from council tax vs the cohort median of 61%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£200
County / upper-tier£1,580
Police£260
Fire & rescue£88
GLA precept£0
Parish average£51
Total Band-D£2,178

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.8 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Tendring split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling35.4% of net spend · cohort median 32%
52 of 158+11% vs median
Planning & Economic Development17.9% of net spend · cohort median 14%
50 of 158+24% vs median
Culture & Leisure16.3% of net spend · cohort median 13%
50 of 158+21% vs median
Housing & Homelessness14.6% of net spend · cohort median 14%
73 of 158+4% vs median
Corporate & Central10.9% of net spend · cohort median 27%
149 of 158-59% vs median
Adult Social Care5.6% of net spend · cohort median 1%
6 of 24+605% vs median
Public Health0.3% of net spend · cohort median 0%
22 of 38-30% vs median
Highways & Transport-1.0% of net spend · cohort median -2%
61 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.29 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats

Tendring’s territory crosses 2 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Clacton2276% Nigel FarageRef
Harwich and North Essex1034% Bernard JenkinCon
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
Not yet ingested for Tendring
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level