The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Oxford.

Labour Party-controlled district. £26m net revenue. 24 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats48 councillors · 24 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Net revenue · 2025-26
£26m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,557
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
20/48
Labour Party 42%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, opposed area.

Oxford is a district controlled by Labour Party (20 of 48 seats). Net revenue is £26m for 2025-26. It covers 24 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.48 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 20Green 13LD 9Independent Oxford Alliance 4Ind 1Independent Berwick Hills Resident 1

Labour Party 42% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Mike RowleyLabBarton Sandhills2026
Asima QayyumLabBarton Sandhills2024
Lubna ArshadLabBlackbird Leys2026
Linda Kay SmithLabBlackbird Leys2024
Sushila Devi DhallGrnCarfax Jericho2026
Lizzy DigginsLabCarfax Jericho2024
Susan Woolford BrownLabChurchill2026
Mark Robert LygoLabChurchill2024
Edward MundyGrnCowley2026
Ian YeatmanIndCowley2024
Laurence George FouweatherLDCutteslowe Sunnymead2026
Andrew John GantLDCutteslowe Sunnymead2024
Showing 12 of 48·All 48 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

63%
Council tax
£16.5m · median 61%
23%
Central grants
£6.1m · median 26%
14%
Business rates
£3.6m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 63% council tax, 23% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£357
County / upper-tier£1,911
Police£283
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Parish average£6
Total Band-D£2,557

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Oxford split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling45.5% of net spend · cohort median 32%
17 of 158+42% vs median
Housing & Homelessness45.3% of net spend · cohort median 14%
2 of 158+223% vs median
Culture & Leisure19.0% of net spend · cohort median 13%
34 of 158+42% vs median
Corporate & Central6.7% of net spend · cohort median 27%
155 of 158-75% vs median
Planning & Economic Development-5.0% of net spend · cohort median 14%
151 of 158-135% vs median
Highways & Transport-11.5% of net spend · cohort median -2%
135 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.7,307 payments · £52.7m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
OXFORD DIRECT SERVICES LTD - (QL ONLY)£11.70m22.2%3,358
OXFORD DIRECT SERVICES LTD£10.01m19.0%237
BROWNE JACOBSON LLP£5.52m10.5%19
EQUANS REGENERATION LTD£3.21m6.1%7
HILL RESIDENTIAL LTD£1.30m2.5%2
REED SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LTD£0.94m1.8%55
SCC (SPECIALIST COMPUTER CENTRES PLC)£0.90m1.7%60
LIFE BUILD SOLUTIONS LTD£0.69m1.3%4
CBRE LTD£0.62m1.2%3
NPOWER£0.55m1.0%216

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.24 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Oxford East1771% Anneliese DoddsInd
Oxford West and Abingdon729% Layla MoranLD
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
7,307 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level