The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

North Yorkshire.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled unitary. £689m net revenue. 89 wards across 7 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats90 councillors · 89 wards
Last election5 May 2022
Websitenorthyorks.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£689m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,418
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
47/90
Conservative and Unionist Party 52%
Westminster
7
constituencies overlap · 3 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, 3-party MP geography.

North Yorkshire is a unitary controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (47 of 90 seats). Net revenue is £689m for 2025-26. It covers 89 wards spanning 7 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 3 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.90 seats · last contested 5 May 2022

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 47Independent Berwick Hills Resident 13Lab 12LD 12Green 5The Liberal Party 1

Conservative and Unionist Party 52% · last contested 5 May 2022

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Andy BrownGrnAire Valley2022
John Keith WeighellConAiskew Leeming2022
Steve MasonLDAmotherby Ampleforth2022
Andrew LeeConAppleton Roebuck Church Fenton2022
Steph DuckettLabBarlby Riccall2022
David WebsterConBedale2022
David Lloyd IretonConBentham Ingleton2022
Monika SlaterLDBilton Grange New Park2022
Paul HaslamConBilton Nidd Gorge2022
Robert WindassConBoroughbridge Claro2022
Mark CraneConBrayton Barlow2022
Mike JordanConCamblesforth Carlton2022
Showing 12 of 90·All 90 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

70%
Council tax
£482.3m · median 59%
23%
Central grants
£159.6m · median 30%
7%
Business rates
£47.2m · median 11%

This is a high-council-tax unitary authoritie: 70% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (59%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,940
County / upper-tier£0
Police£321
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£107
Parish average£51
Total Band-D£2,418

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does North Yorkshire split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education37.0% of net spend · cohort median 36%
25 of 61+3% vs median
Adult Social Care32.9% of net spend · cohort median 27%
6 of 61+21% vs median
Waste & Recycling7.6% of net spend · cohort median 6%
8 of 61+32% vs median
Children's Services7.4% of net spend · cohort median 15%
61 of 61-50% vs median
Corporate & Central3.3% of net spend · cohort median 3%
22 of 61+15% vs median
Highways & Transport3.1% of net spend · cohort median 3%
22 of 61+19% vs median
Culture & Leisure2.7% of net spend · cohort median 2%
21 of 61+23% vs median
Public Health2.4% of net spend · cohort median 4%
53 of 61-34% vs median
Planning & Economic Development2.3% of net spend · cohort median 1%
9 of 61+70% vs median
Housing & Homelessness1.3% of net spend · cohort median 2%
46 of 61-32% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.89 wards split across 7 parliamentary seats

North Yorkshire’s territory crosses 7 Westminster constituencies, with 3 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Scarborough and Whitby1517% Alison HumeLab
Richmond and Northallerton1416% Rishi SunakCon
Skipton and Ripon1416% Julian SmithCon
Thirsk and Malton1416% Kevin HollinrakeCon
Harrogate and Knaresborough1213% Tom GordonLD
Selby1112% Keir MatherLab
Wetherby and Easingwold910% Alec ShelbrookeCon
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 4 Ind, 2 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled unitary — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
Not yet ingested for North Yorkshire
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level